About our research

GPCC's research

Approximately 200 national and international researchers from a wide range of disciplines collaborate within GPCC. A number of patient and public representatives also participate in our research projects, which primarily focus on person-centred care, rehabilitation, and care for older people across diverse patient groups and health conditions. We also study the organisation and leadership of care, as well as strategies for the effective implementation of person-centred care in practice.

Drawing on more than 15 years of experience in multiprofessional and interdisciplinary research, GPCC has demonstrated that person-centred care is applicable across healthcare contexts and settings.

Research conducted at GPCC shows that person-centred care contributes to higher quality outcomes for patients, healthcare organisations, and society at large, while also improving the use of resources and cost management. At the same time, our findings highlight that achieving these outcomes requires a systematic and structured approach. A deep understanding of how person-centred ethics are translated into everyday practice is essential.

Successful implementation also depends on integrating the expertise and perspectives of patients and their relatives, healthcare professionals and managers, as well as actors from civil society. This collaborative approach enables systematic initiation, delivery, and documentation of person-centred care, ensuring sustainable and measurable impact.

Therefore, partnerships across the micro, meso, and macro levels are essential for the system transformation required to achieve person-centred care. A core focus of our research is to understand how large-scale system integration can be realised through the interaction of both bottom-up and top-down approaches, linking practice, leadership, policy, and society.

Four Strategic Research Lines

In 2025 GPCC established four strategic research lines that guide our long-term research agenda:

1. Precision Health

We conduct research on precision health, defined as the integration of precision medicine and person-centred care. This research aims to develop more tailored, effective, and equitable approaches to prevention, treatment, and care.

2. Governance

Our research on person-centred governance focuses on governance structures, organisational models, and economic steering mechanisms that support the implementation and scaling of person-centred integrated care.

3. Digital Infrastructures

We investigate the role of digital infrastructures, data, and artificial intelligence in the future of health and care systems, with particular attention to how these technologies can be developed and used in alignment with the ethics and values of person-centred care.

4. Crisis Situations

We also conduct research on person-centred care in contexts of war, crises, and disasters, aiming to understand how resilient health and care systems can be built and sustained both in peacetime and during extreme conditions.

Strategic focus areas

GPCC's research can be sorted into three strategic focus areas:

1. Development, adaptation and evaluation of person-centred care
2. Enable transitioning to person-centred health care and care
3. Development of partnerships between patient representatives, the general public and healthcare organizations and decision-making systems

Read more about the focus areas here.

We also have strategic collaboration projects. Read more about them here.

Our research projects

Ongoing research projects

For a list of our ongoing research projects with links to each projects web page, click here.

Completed research projects

For a list of our completed research projects, click here.

Phd projects and theses

For information about on-going and completed PhD-projects linked to GPCC, with links to theses, click here.

Scientific publications

Click here to see scientific publications from GPCC and The University of Gothenburg.

Person-centred care has positive effects

GPCC has evaluated the effects of a person-centred approach in a number of studies in different health and care contexts, for example in orthopaedic and internal medicine, as well as across the whole care continuum, from hospital care and outpatient care to primary care, and beyond. Apart from the reduction of costs, significant positive effects from a patient perspective have been reported, as the care is tailored to each individual person, and his or her resources are considered and included.

Research outcomes

GPCC researchers conduct interdisciplinary research in various health care settings involving various groups of professionals and patients. 

Theoretical and practical development

GPCC's research takes its starting point in ethics rooted in philosophical literature on what it means to be human, a person [1,2]. A key part of applying this ethic (person-centredness) in practice is to establish partnerships between healthcare professionals and patients (and relatives when relevant). This partnership is initiated by inviting patients to tell their narrative, actively listening to that narrative, agreeing on a plan for the patient's care and documenting the plan - in ways that becomes useful to the patient.

The research that has been carried out so far at GPCC has primarily been focused on adults. Person-centred care for children is an area under development, in which it is central to use the child's perspective as the starting point. Tools and methods like, for example, pictorial support and principles for universal design can be very helpful in achieving this [3].

Our research includes studies examining how partnerships can be created and developed, but also problematizing on what partnerships can entail [4-9].

Conversations between patients and healthcare professionals are central to the partnership. When conducting person-centred conversations in health care settings, a fundamental difference has been shown between talking to and talking together with the patient [10]. For a conversation to be person-centred, it is central to talk with the patient. This can, for example, entail the patient and health care professional together agreeing on the agenda at the beginning of the conversation, and that both participants contribute with their respective knowledge and experience.

Our research focusing on conversations between patients and healthcare professionals involves different patient groups, for example, adult patients with mental disorders [11], irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) [12], cancer [10], adult patients with different types of communication disorders [13-14], and children with cancer or congenital heart defects [15].

Effects of person-centred care for patients

A large number of intervention studies on person-centred care have been conducted. Mainly in hospital care and specialized outpatient care, but some studies have also been conducted in primary care. The studies have mainly been carried out with experimental and quasi-experimental design [16]. Experimental studies require that participants are randomly divided into groups that receive either person-centred care or standard care. Quasi-experimental studies entail participants being treated based on which health care unit they visit, for example, one hospital ward can provide person-centred care while another ward provides standard care. These interventions focus either on person-centred care in relation to a specific health problem (for example incontinence, obesity, or pain), or on the patient's general health.

A study compiling 15 of GPCC's controlled intervention studies found that 9 of these reported statistically significant improvements in at least one of the studied outcomes [17]. Positive effects reported from adult/elderly patients are, for example, an increased confidence in one's own ability to manage one's illness (self-efficacy), an improved experience of health, and an improved satisfaction with care. Studies have also shown improved symptom control, improved physical function/capacity, improved activities of daily living, and fewer deteriorations for people with chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Image

In yet another publication, where the effect of a person-centred intervention aimed at young people with chronic pain was evaluated, an increased confidence in one's own ability to participate in everyday activities was noted [18].

GPCC's research also includes studies in which person-centred care has been carried out remotely, by telephone or via digital platforms. An increasing number of technical solutions to facilitate person-centred care remotely have been evaluated in recent years [19-21]. In a study where intervention via a digital platform in combination with telephone support was tested, patients report that person-centred care ensured they were given access to support for self-management according to their own needs [19]. In another study where a digital app for self-management of high blood pressure was evaluated, results show that patients feel that they have taken on a more active role in their own care and that co-creation between patient and care staff was facilitated [20].

Effects of person-centred care for staff

There are also studies that have shown positive effects for healthcare staff from a person-centred approach, such as improved satisfaction with their work, reduced stress of conscience and an improved psychosocial work environment [22].

Use of resources

Health economics studies are important for understanding how society's common resources are used. Some studies have examined the effects of introducing person-centred care on the health system's resource use and costs. A couple of studies which observed the length of hospital stay showed that person-centred care led to shorter hospital stays [23,24], and that the shorter stay did not increase the risk of readmission or jeopardize the patient's health-related quality of life [23]. Several studies have also shown that person-centred care can lead to cost savings or be cost-effective compared to standard care [25-28].

There are also studies that show that person-centred care leads to a more efficient use of resources in health care [29-31]. For example, in a study evaluating an intervention for patients for whom cancer surgery was planned, positive effects were seen on the patients' ability to search and use information, and patients knew who to turn to a greater extent, instead of for example visiting the emergency department [31].

Implementation of person-centred care

Studies that evaluate the implementation of person-centred care have been carried out in various settings, for example in hospital care [32-37], in psychiatric care [38], and in care of older people in out-of-hospital settings [39].

Key factors described for implementation of person-centred care are, for example, creating a common intention for change (sense of urgency) and that co-creation between care staff from different professions is facilitated [36]. Strong leadership and strategies for overcoming existing methods for documentation have also been described as crucial [40]. Several factors can affect implementation, such as differences in the understanding of what person-centred care includes and how it should be practiced, which can be linked to both local traditions in the workplace and different professions in the team [35].

The introduction of teaching methods and learning of person-centredness has also been investigated in higher education at universities. A study of university teachers' experience of developing an inter-professional course in person-centred care showed, for example, that there was an unfamiliarity with the pedagogy involved in the learning of person-centred care [41]. Creating partnerships between the teachers involved and with students was seen as crucial.

Practice tools for person-centred care

Over the years GPCC researchers have developed and tested a variety of practice tools to support the learning, implementation and evaluation of person-centred care in various ways. Strategies for elicitation of patient narratives and co-creation of health and care, information materials, validated questionnaires, videos and digital platforms are some examples of such tools. You can read more about the types of tools that have been developed or are under development here.

References

[1] Ekman, I., Swedberg, K., Taft, C., Lindseth, A., Norberg, A., Brink, E., Carlsson, J., Dahlin-Ivanoff, S., Johansson, I-L., Kjellgren, K., Lidén, E.,  Öhlén, J.,  Olsson, L-E., Rosén, H., Rydmark, M., & Stibrant Sunnerhagen, M. (2011). Person-centered care - Ready for prime time. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 10(4), 248-251. doi:10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2011.06.008.

[2] Britten, N., Moore, L., Lydahl, D., Naldemirci, Ö., Elam, M., & Wolf, A. (2017). Elaboration of the Gothenburg model of person-centred care. Health Expectations, 20(3), 407-418. doi:10.1111/hex.12468

[3] Thunberg, G., Johnson, E., Bornman, J., Öhlén, J., & Nilsson, S. (2021). Being heard–Supporting person‐centred communication in paediatric care using augmentative and alternative communication as universal design: A position paper. Nursing Inquiry, e12426. doi:10.1111/nin.12426

[4] Wolf, A., Moore, L., Lydahl, D., Naldemirci, Ö., Elam, M., & Britten, N. (2017). The realities of partnership in person-centred care: a qualitative interview study with patients and professionals. BMJ Open, 7(7), e016491. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016491

[5] Naldemirci, Ö., Lydahl, D., Britten, N., Elam, M., Moore, L., & Wolf, A. (2018). Tenacious assumptions of person-centred care? Exploring tensions and variations in practice. Health, 22(1), 54-71. doi:10.1177/1363459316677627

[6] Naldemirci, Ö., Britten, N., Lloyd, H., & Wolf, A. (2020). The potential and pitfalls of narrative elicitation in person-centred care. Health Expectations, 23(1), 238-246. doi:10.1111/hex.12998

[7] Naldemirci, Ö., Britten, N., Lloyd, H., & Wolf, A. (2021). Epistemic injustices in clinical communication: the example of narrative elicitation in person‐centred care. Sociology of health & illness, 43(1), 186-200. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13209

[8] Friberg, F., Wallengren, C., Håkanson, C., Carlsson, E., Smith, F., Pettersson, M., Kenne Sarenmalm, E., Sawatzky, R., & Öhlen, J. (2018). Exploration of dynamics in a complex person-centred intervention process based on health professionals' perspectives. BMC Health Service Research, 18(1), 441. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3218-3

[9] Heckemann, B., Chaaya, M., Jakobsson Ung, E., Olsson, D. S., & Jakobsson, S. (2020). Finding the Person in Electronic Health Records. A Mixed-methods Analysis of Person-centered Content and Language. Health Communication, 37(4), 418-424. doi:10.1080/10410236.2020.1846275

[10] Pettersson, M. E., Öhlen, J., Friberg, F., Hyden, L. C., Wallengren, C., Sarenmalm, E. K., & Carlsson, E. (2018). Prepared for surgery - Communication in nurses' preoperative consultations with patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer after a person-centred intervention. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(13-14), 2904-2916. doi:10.1111/jocn.14312

[11] Cederberg, M., Fors, A., Ali, L., Goulding, A., & Mäkitalo, Å. (2022). The interactive work of narrative elicitation in person-centred care: Analysis of phone conversations between health care professionals and patients with common mental disorders. Health expectations, online ahead of print. doi:10.1111/hex.13440

[12] Forsgren, E., & Björkman, I. (2021). Interactional practices in person-centred care: Conversation analysis of nurse-patient disagreement during self-management support. Health expectations, 24(3), 940-950. doi:10.1111/hex.13236

[13] Saldert, C., Forsgren, E., & Hartelius, L. (2016). Teaching medical students about communication in speech-language disorders: Effects of a lecture and a workshop. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(6), 571-579. doi:10.3109/17549507.2016.1143975

[14] Forsgren, E., Hartelius, L., & Saldert, C. (2017). Improving medical students' knowledge and skill in communicating with people with acquired communication disorders. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(6), 541-550. doi:10.1080/17549507.2016.1216602

[15] Wiljén, A., Chaplin, J.E., Crine, V., Jobe, W., Johnson, E., Karlsson, K., Lindroth, T., Schwarz, A., Stenmarker, M., Thunberg, G., Öhlén, J., & Nilsson, S. (2022). The Development of an mHealth Tool for Children With Long-term Illness to Enable Person-Centered Communication: User-Centered Design Approach. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, 5(1), e30364. doi:10.2196/30364.

[16] Gyllensten, H., Björkman, I., Jakobsson Ung, E., Ekman, I., & Jakobsson, S. (2020). A national research centre for the evaluation and implementation of person‐centred care: Content from the first interventional studies. Health Expectations, 23(5), 1362-1375. doi: 10.1111/hex.13120

[17] Britten, N., Ekman, I., Naldemirci, Ö., Javinger, M., Hedman, H., & Wolf, A. (2020). Learning from Gothenburg model of person centred healthcare. BMJ, 370, m2738. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2738

[18] Fors, A., Wallbing, U., Alfvén, G., Kemani, M. K., Lundberg, M., Wigert, H., & Nilsson, S. (2020). Effects of a person-centred approach in a school setting for adolescents with chronic pain—The HOPE randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Pain, 24, 1598–1608. doi:10.1002/ejp.1614

[19] Barenfeld, E., Ali, L., Wallstrom, S., Fors, A., & Ekman, I. (2020). Becoming more of an insider: A grounded theory study on patients' experience of a person-centred e-health intervention. PLoS One, 15(11), e0241801. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241801

[20] Andersson, U., Bengtsson, U., Ranerup, A., Midlöv, P., & Kjellgren, K. (2021). Patients and Professionals as Partners in Hypertension Care: Qualitative Substudy of a Randomized Controlled Trial Using an Interactive Web-Based System Via Mobile Phone. Journal of medical Internet research, 23(6), e26143-e26143. doi:10.2196/26143

[21] Ali, L., Wallstrom, S., Ekman, I., Swedberg, K., & Fors, A. (2021). Effects of person-centred care via telephone on self-efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Nursing Open, 8(2), 927-935. doi:10.1002/nop2.701

[22] van Diepen, C., Fors, A., Ekman, I., & Hensing, G. (2020). Association between person-centred care and healthcare providers' job satisfaction and work-related health: a scoping review. Bmj Open, 10(12). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042658

[23] Ekman, I., Wolf, A., Olsson, L. E., Taft, C., Dudas, K., Schaufelberger, M., & Swedberg, K. (2012). Effects of person-centred care in patients with chronic heart failure: the PCC-HF study. European Heart Journal, 33(9), 1112-1119. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr306

[24] Hansson, E., Ekman, I., Swedberg, K., Wolf, A., Dudas, K., Ehlers, L., & Olsson, L. E. (2016). Person-centred care for patients with chronic heart failure - a cost-utility analysis. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 15(4), 276-284. doi:10.1177/1474515114567035

[25] Gyllensten, H., Koinberg, I., Carlstrom, E., Olsson, L. E., & Hansson Olofsson, E. (2019). Economic evaluation of a person-centred care intervention in head and neck oncology: results from a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer, 27(5), 1825-1834. doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4436-2

[26] Pirhonen, L., Bolin, K., Olofsson, E. H., Fors, A., Ekman, I., Swedberg, K., & Gyllensten, H. (2019). Person-Centred Care in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside a Randomised Controlled Trial. PharmacoEconomics Open, 3(4), 495-504. doi:10.1007/s41669-019-0126-3

[27] Pirhonen, L., Gyllensten, H., Fors, A., & Bolin, K. (2020a). Modelling the cost-effectiveness of person-centred care for patients with acute coronary syndrome. European Journal of Health Economics, 21(9), 1317-1327. doi:10.1007/s10198-020-01230-8

[28] Pirhonen, L., Gyllensten, H., Olofsson, E. H., Fors, A., Ali, L., Ekman, I., & Bolin, K. (2020b). The cost-effectiveness of person-centred care provided to patients with chronic heart failure and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Health Policy Open, 1, 100005. doi:10.1016/j.hpopen.2020.100005

[29] Larsson, I., Bergman, S., Fridlund, B., & Arvidsson, B. (2012). Patients’ experiences of a nurse-led rheumatology clinic in Sweden: A qualitative study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 14(4), 501-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2012.00723.x.

[30] Larsson, I., Fridlund, B., Arvidsson, B., Teleman, A., & Bergman, S. (2014). Randomized controlled trial of a nurse-led rheumatology clinic for monitoring biological therapy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(1), 164-75. doi:10.1111/jan.12183

[31] Öhlen, J., Sawatzky, R., Pettersson, M., Sarenmalm, E. K., Larsdotter, C., Smith, F., Wallengren, C., Friberg, F., Kodeda, K., & Carlsson, E. (2019). Preparedness for colorectal cancer surgery and recovery through a person-centred information and communication intervention - A quasi-experimental longitudinal design. PLoS One, 14(12). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0225816

[32] Alharbi, T. S., Ekman, I., Olsson, L. E., Dudas, K., & Carlström, E. (2012). Organizational culture and the implementation of person centered care: results from a change process in Swedish hospital care. Health Policy, 108(2-3), 294-301. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.09.003

[33] Alharbi, T., Carlström, E., Ekman, I., & Olsson, L.-E. (2014). Implementation of Person Centered Care: Management Perspective. Journal of Hospital Administration, 3(3), 107-120. doi:10.5430/jha.v3n3p107

[34] Carlstrom, E., & Olsson, L. E. (2014). The association between subcultures and resistance to change - in a Swedish hospital clinic. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 28(4), 458-476. doi:10.1108/Jhom-09-2012-0184

[35] Friberg, F., Wallengren, C., Hakanson, C., Carlsson, E., Smith, F., Pettersson, M., Kenne Sarenmalm, E., Sawatzk, R., & Öhlen, J. (2018). Exploration of dynamics in a complex person-centred intervention process based on health professionals' perspectives. BMC Health Service Research, 18(1), 441. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3218-3

[36] Erichsen Andersson, A., Frodin, M., Dellenborg, L., Wallin, L., Hok, J., Gillespie, B. M., & Wikstrom, E. (2018). Iterative co-creation for improved hand hygiene and aseptic techniques in the operating room: experiences from the safe hands study. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 2. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2783-1

[37] Dellenborg, L., Wikstrom, E., & Erichsen, A. A. (2019). Factors that may promote the learning of person-centred care: an ethnographic study of an implementation programme for healthcare professionals in a medical emergency ward in Sweden. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 24(2), 353-381. doi:10.1007/s10459-018-09869-y

[38] Allerby, K., Goulding, A., Ali, L., & Waern, M. (2020). Striving for a more person-centered psychosis care: results of a hospital-based multi-professional educational intervention. BMC Psychiatry, 20(1), 523. doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02871-y

[39] Ebrahimi, Z., Patel, H., Wijk, H., Ekman, I., & Olaya-Contreras, P. (2021). A systematic review on implementation of person-centered care interventions for older people in out-of-hospital settings. Geriatric Nursing, 42(1), 213-224. doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.08.004

[40] Moore, L., Britten, N., Lydahl, D., Naldemirci, O., Elam, M., & Wolf, A. (2017). Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of person-centred care in different healthcare contexts. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 31(4), 662-673. doi:10.1111/scs.12376

[41] Rosengren, K., Danielsson, L., Jansson, I., & Wallengren, C. (2018). Development of an Academic Course in Person-Centred Care for Students in Higher Education: Teachers' Perspectives. Education Research International. doi:10.1155/2018/9854169