Problems and issues in International Relations
Teman och frågeställningar inom Internationella relationer
About the Syllabus
Grading scale
Course modules
Position
The course is given as core course at the first year level of the Bachelor's Programme in International Relations. It can also be studied as a single subject course.
The course can be part of the following programmes: 1) Bachelor's Programme in International Relations (S1INT), 2) Bachelors' programme in Global Studies (S1GLS) and 3) Program in Political Science (S1STV)
Main field of study with advanced study
Entry requirements
Content
The course examines pressing and perennial themes, problems and issues in international relations that shape the global social and political order. These issues are, but certainly not limited to, war and violence, terrorism, peace and peacebuilding, security, nationalism and identity, human rights, gender, poverty, race and racism, development and inequalities, governance and authority and climate change and the environment. The selection of particular themes, challenges and issues addressed during the course will –to some extent– be informed by contemporary events and developments, which means that they might vary from year to year. The course draws upon a variety of academic sources such as, scholarly articles, policy reports, or data bases but also non-academic works of fiction, novels, films and popular culture (understood broadly), to approach these themes, challenges and issues from a variety of perspectives. Students are encouraged to think innovatively through the questions that have been and will be central to these themes and issues (such as, why societies go to war; how race relations and racism affect people; why some people are poorer than others; how can we deal with climate change; how can we understand nationalism) and to grapple with the challenges that accompany particular answers. Problems and issues in International Relations is designed to further ground the student in why and how the study and practice of international relations matters. The course is writing intensive and places strong emphasis on gender, race and class as categories of analysis in an intersectional framework. Students’ curiosity and creativity will be enhanced with different forms of expression and analysis (e.g., videos, ‘narratives’, policy briefs, source criticism, data analysis).
Objectives
Knowledge and understanding
- account for different issues and problems in international relations;
- identify central questions about the social and political order that accompany central themes, challenges and issues in IR.
Competence and skills
- apply relevant concepts and theories to describe and analyze issues and problems in international relations;
- formulate ideas and arguments in the form of different text genres;
- analyze different sources and narratives using basic source-analytical concepts;
- provide and receive constructive critique on individual and group assignments.
Judgement and approach
- critically evaluate the ways in which issues and problems are framed in varied contexts;
- assess the suitability of different theoretical approaches to a problem;
- critically reflect on the knowledge produced through different types of sources and data.
Sustainability labelling
Form of teaching
Forms of teaching vary and include lectures, workshops, IR cafes, seminars, individual and group assignments.
The course may be given in both English and Swedish. When given in English, students wishing to submit their assignments in Swedish may do so.
Examination formats
The course will be examined through four different assignments, one of which is a group assignment.
- Two individual reflection papers; These will receive peer feedback.
- One group assignment;
- One longer individual assignment.
If a student who has twice received a failing grade for the same examination component wishes to change examiner ahead of the next examination session, such a request should be made to the department in writing and should be approved by the department unless there are special reasons to the contrary (Chapter 6 Section 22 of the Higher Education Ordinance).
If a student has received a recommendation from the University of Gothenburg for study support for students with disabilities, the examiner may, where it is compatible with the learning outcomes of the course and provided that no unreasonable resources are required, decide to allow the student to sit an adjusted exam or alternative form of assessment.
In the event that a course has ceased or undergone major changes, students are to be guaranteed at least three examination sessions (including the ordinary examination session) over a period of at least one year, but no more than two years after the course has ceased/been changed. The same applies to internships and professional placements (VFU), although this is restricted to just one additional examination session.
If a student has been informed that he/she fulfils the requirements for being a student at the Swedish Sports University (RIU student), the examiner has the right to decide on adjustments during the examination, if this is done in accordance with the Local Rules for RIU students at the University of Gothenburg.
Grades
- Individual reflection papers (2 hp + 3 hp) are graded on the scale U/G.
- Group assignment (2 hp) is graded on the scale U/G.
- The longer individual assignment (8 hp) is graded on the scale U/G/VG.
To be awarded the grade “Pass”, the student needs to receive at least a “Pass” on all four assignments. For the grade “Pass with Distinction,” the student needs to receive at least a “Pass” on all fourassignments, and the longer individual assignment needs to be awarded the grade “Pass with distinction.”
Course evaluation
The course coordinator is responsible for systematically and regularly collecting the students' views of the course, and for making sure that the results of the evaluations in different forms are taken into consideration when developing the course. The results and possible changes to the course will be shared with the students who participated in the evaluation and the next class to take the course