Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Comparative analyses of p… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Comparative analyses of phenotypic and genotypic methods for detection of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) toxins and colonization factors

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Åsa Sjöling
Gudrun Wiklund
Stephen Savarino
D. I. Cohen
Ann-Mari Svennerholm
Publicerad i J Clin Microbiol
Volym 45
Nummer/häfte 10
Sidor 3295-3301
ISSN 0095-1137
Publiceringsår 2007
Publicerad vid Institutionen för biomedicin, avdelningen för mikrobiologi och immunologi
Sidor 3295-3301
Språk en
Länkar dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00471-07
Ämneskategorier Mikrobiologi inom det medicinska området

Sammanfattning

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is one of the main causes of childhood-diarrhoea in developing countries and in travellers. However, this pathogen has often not been reported in surveys of diarrhoeal pathogens due to lack of simple standardized methods to detect ETEC in many laboratories. ETEC express one or both of two different enterotoxin subtypes; heat stable toxins (STh and STp), a heat labile toxin (LT) and more than 22 different colonisation factors (CFs) that mediate adherence to the intestinal cell wall. Here we compare established phenotypic and genotypic methods and newly developed PCR methods with respect to sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and ease of performance. The methods include GM1-ELISA and dot blot techniques using specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) for the phenotypic detection of the toxins and CFs, respectively as well as different PCR and DNA/DNA hybridisation techniques, including new PCR assays, for genotypic identification of the toxin and CF genes, respectively. We found very good general agreement in results derived from genotypic and phenotypic methods. In a few strains, LT and CFs were identified genetically but not phenotypically. Based on our analyses we recommend initial screening for ETEC in clinical samples by multiplex toxin gene PCR. Toxin positive strains may then be analysed by dot-blot tests for detection of the CFs expressed on the bacterial surface and by PCR for determination of additional CFs for which MAbs are currently lacking as well as for strains that harbour silent CF genes.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?