Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Oral implant surfaces: Pa… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Oral implant surfaces: Part 2--review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Tomas Albrektsson
Ann Wennerberg
Publicerad i Int J Prosthodont
Volym 17
Nummer/häfte 5
Sidor 544-64
Publiceringsår 2004
Publicerad vid Institutionen för de kirurgiska disciplinerna, Avdelningen för biomaterialvetenskap
Odontologiska institutionen, Avdelningen för oral protetik/odontologisk materialvetenskap
Sidor 544-64
Språk en
Länkar www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.f...
Ämnesord Bone Transplantation, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, *Dental Implants, *Dental Prosthesis Design, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Osseointegration, Prospective Studies, Randomized Controlled Trials, Retrospective Studies, Surface Properties
Ämneskategorier Odontologi

Sammanfattning

PURPOSE: This article reviews clinical knowledge of selected oral implant surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The surfaces most commonly used in clinical practice, marketed by the five largest oral implant companies, are identified; their clinical documentation was scrutinized following a strict protocol. Experimental knowledge of the surfaces is briefly summarized. Retrospective, prospective, and comparative clinical studies were analyzed separately, as were studies of implants in conjunction with bone grafts. RESULTS: TiUnite anodized surfaces are clinically documented in 1- to 2-year follow-up studies at best, with failures at about 3%. Sandblasted and acid-etched SLA surfaces are documented with good clinical results for up to 3 years. Osseotite dual acid-etched implants are documented with good clinical results for up to 5 years. Frialit-2 sandblasted and etched implants are positively documented for about 3 years in one study only. The Tioblast implant is the only design documented for survival over 10 years of follow-up and success over 7 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Generally, oral implants are introduced clinically without adequate clinical documentation. Implant companies initiate clinical documentation after product launch. The standards of clinical reporting have improved over the years. Proper long-term reports have been published for only one surface, Tioblast.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?