Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Piezoelectric bone surger… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Piezoelectric bone surgery for implant site preparation compared with conventional drilling techniques: A systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare C. Stacchi
F. Bassi
G. Troiano
A. Rapani
T. Lombardi
A. Jokstad
Lars Sennerby
G. Schierano
Publicerad i European Journal of Oral Implantology
Volym 13
Nummer/häfte 2
Sidor 141-158
ISSN 1756-2406
Publiceringsår 2020
Publicerad vid Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper
Sidor 141-158
Språk en
Ämnesord implant site preparation, implant stability, piezosurgery, trial, sequential analysis, dental implants, ex-vivo, in-vivo, osseointegration, stability, insertion, piezosurgery, interface, density, split, Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Ämneskategorier Odontologi

Sammanfattning

Purpose: To evaluate whether the use of piezoelectric bone surgery (PBS) for implant site preparation reduces surgical time, improves implant stability, preserves marginal bone level and improves the survival rate of oral implants compared with conventional drilling techniques. Materials and methods: This meta-analysis followed the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis) guidelines and was registered in the PROSPERO (international prospective register of systematic reviews) database (CRD42019142749). The PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Open Grey databases were screened for articles published from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2018. The selection criteria included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and case-control studies (CCTs) comparing the PBS with conventional rotary instruments for implant site preparation, and reporting any of the selected clinical outcomes (surgical time, implant stability, marginal bone variations and implant failure rate) for both groups. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for RCTs and the NewcastleOttawa scale (NOS) for CCTs. A meta-analysis was performed, and the power of the metaanalytic findings was assessed by trial sequential analysis (TSA). Results: Eight RCTs and one CCT met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The meta-analysis and the TSA showed moderate evidence suggesting that the PBS prolongs surgery duration and improves secondary stability 12 weeks after implant placement compared with conventional drilling techniques. Insufficient data are available in literature to assess if the PBS reduces marginal bone loss and/or improves the implant survival rate compared with conventional drilling techniques. Conclusions: Adequately powered randomised clinical trials are needed to confirm the PBS positive effect on the secondary stability and to draw conclusions about the influence of PBS on marginal bone stability and implant survival.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?