Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Question-to-Learn Science… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Question-to-Learn Science in Higher Education: A Quantitative Study

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Lars Bengtsson
Publicerad i Higher Education Research
Volym 5
Nummer/häfte 3
Sidor 83-93
ISSN 2578-9341
Publiceringsår 2020
Publicerad vid Institutionen för fysik (GU)
Sidor 83-93
Språk en
Länkar www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/he...
https://gup.ub.gu.se/file/208146
Ämnesord Writing-Across-the-Curriculum; Writing-to-Learn; Question-to-Learn; Higher Order Thinking Skills;
Ämneskategorier Pedagogik, Lärande

Sammanfattning

This work reports the results of a case study where traditional activities in an engineering/science classroom, such as demonstrations and self-paced activities, were compared with ‘writing across the curriculum” (WAC) activities. One group did writing-to-learn assignments and one group did our seminal construct ‘question-to-learn’ where they designed exam problems for their peers. A model is presented which describes the parameters that influence the exam score outcome. Some of these variables were carefully controlled during the project (labs, textbook, lecturer) and some other parameters were measured (lecture attendance, time-on-task and previous knowledge) in order to minimize data corruption due to confounding variables. The main parameter of interest, the ‘predictor’ of the exam score was the extra-curricular activity. A pre-test and a post-test were also conducted in order to establish the students relative gain. We also tested the hypothesis of using the quality of the students’ WAC outputs as a predictor of academic achievements. Data is analyzed both with parametric and non-parametric methods and results show that there was no significant difference between the groups on exam scores and that the relationship between WAC quality and exam scores is not significant. The main reason for the non-significant results is concluded to be due to low participation rates and too low “dosage”.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?