Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Feasibility and Functions… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Feasibility and Functions of Central Venous Catheters versus Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Martin Hubrich
Sophie Lindgren
Lars Rydberg
Britt-Marie Iresjö
Kent Lundholm
Cecilia Engström
Publicerad i Open Journal of Surgery
Volym 3
Nummer/häfte 2
Sidor 028-033
ISSN 2689-0593
Publiceringsår 2019
Publicerad vid Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för kirurgi
Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för anestesiologi och intensivvård
Sidor 028-033
Språk en
Länkar https://www.scireslit.com/Surgery/O...
Ämnesord Central venous catheterization; Peripherally inserted central catheter; Central venous access; Central venous catheter thrombosis; Deep venous thrombosis; Adverse event; Gastrointestinal surgery
Ämneskategorier Anestesi och intensivvård, Kirurgi

Sammanfattning

Safety, risk of complications and the functional feasibility among diff erent kinds of central venous access are still a matter of debate. Not many clinical trials have reported a comparison of complications and patency of CVCs versus Peripherally Inserted Catheters (PICC) as central venous access for indoor patients with advanced gastrointestinal disorder. The aim of the present study was to compare CVCs and PICCs regarding function, complications and convenience in a controlled clinical study on patients aimed for oncology surgery aimed for cure. Distributions of patients were comparable. Malignant diagnoses were signifi cantly higher among CVC-patients. CVCs and PICCs were used for treatment during equal number of days, without any signifi cant complication rates and with comparable number of days on antibiotics and other potent drugs. The overall cumulative hazard (risk) for treatment interruptions, due to either full-fi lled clinical indications or due to any complication among the subgroups of patients did not diff er. Central Venous Catheter and Peripheral Inserted Central Venous Catheter, for central venous access, did not diff er among consecutive unselected patients with serious gastro-intestinal disorders.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?