Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Social Stigma and Support… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Social Stigma and Support for the Populist Radical Right: An Experimental Study

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare E. Harteveld
S. Dahlberg
Andrej Kokkonen
W. van der Brug
Publicerad i Scandinavian Political Studies
Volym 42
Nummer/häfte 3-4
Sidor 296-307
ISSN 0080-6757
Publiceringsår 2019
Publicerad vid Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
Sidor 296-307
Språk en
Länkar dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12153
Ämneskategorier Statsvetenskap

Sammanfattning

The 'taboo' or 'stigma' associated with many populist radical right parties (PRRPs) has been argued to be an important constraint on their electoral success. In comparison to mainstream parties, there seems to be a higher barrier keeping voters from supporting PRRPs. However, this mechanism has not been tested directly. We conducted a randomized survey-embedded experiment manipulating the social stigma of a fictitious radical right party in Sweden. We compare three conditions. Two of these contain subtle signals about how other respondents feel about this party. In one condition the fictitious party is supported by many voters (the neutralizing condition) and in the other it is evaluated negatively by the overwhelming majority (the stigma condition). Both experimental groups do not differ significant from the control group in support for this fictitious party. However, the difference between the two experimental groups is borderline significant. This suggests that there is a causal effect of social stigma on support for a RRP, even though the evidence is rather tentative.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?