Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Difficulties and possibil… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Difficulties and possibilities in communication between referring clinicians and radiologists: perspective of clinicians

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Nabi Fatahi
Ferid Krupic
Mikael Hellström
Publicerad i Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Volym 12
Sidor 555-564
ISSN 1178-2390
Publiceringsår 2019
Publicerad vid Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för radiologi
Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för ortopedi
Sidor 555-564
Språk en
Länkar dx.doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.S207649
Ämnesord interprofessional communication, referring physician, radiologist, face-to-face communication, radiology report, interprofessional trust, consultations, professionalism, collaboration, interpreters, nonemergent, physicians, impact, trust, care, Health Care Sciences & Services
Ämneskategorier Klinisk medicin

Sammanfattning

Purpose: To investigate modes and quality of interprofessional communication between clinicians and radiologists, and to identify difficulties and possibilities in this context, as experienced by referring clinicians. Patients and methods: Focus group interviews with 22 clinicians from different specialties were carried out. The leading question was: "How do you experience communication, verbal and nonverbal, between referring clinicians and radiologists?" Content analysis was used for interpretation of data. Results: Overall, referring clinicians expressed satisfaction with their interprofessional communication with radiologists, and digital access to image data was highly appreciated. However, increased reliance on digital communication has led to reduced face-to-face contacts between clinicians and radiologists. This seems to constitute a potential threat to bilateral feedback, joint educational opportunities, and interprofessional development. Cumbersome medical information software systems, time constraints, shortage of staff, reliance on teleradiology, and lack of uniform format of radiology reports were mentioned as problematic. Further implementation of structured reporting was considered beneficial. Conclusion: Deepened face-to-face contacts between clinicians and radiologists were considered prerequisites for mutual understanding, deepened competence and mutual trust; a key factor in interprofessional communication. Clinicians and radiologists should come together in order to secure bilateral feedback and obtain deepened knowledge of the specific needs of subspecialized clinicians.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?