Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Food systems sustainabili… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Food systems sustainability: An examination of different viewpoints on food system change

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Gareth Haysom
Gunilla Almered Olsson
Mirek Dymitrow
Paul Opiyo
Nick Taylor Buck
Michael Oloko
Charlotte Spring
Kristina Fermskog
Karin Ingelhag
Shelley Kotze
Stephen Gaya Agong
Publicerad i Sustainability
Volym 11
Nummer/häfte 12
ISSN 2071-1050
Publiceringsår 2019
Publicerad vid Institutionen för ekonomi och samhälle, Kulturgeografi
Institutionen för globala studier, humanekologi
Mistra Urban Futures
Språk en
Länkar https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123337
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1...
Ämnesord urban food system, food systems change, wicked problems, sustainability, urban food security
Ämneskategorier Social och ekonomisk geografi, Freds- och utvecklingsforskning, Praktisk filosofi, Jordbruksvetenskap, Humanekologi, Kulturgeografi, Livsmedelsvetenskap

Sammanfattning

Global food insecurity levels remain stubbornly high. One of the surest ways to grasp the scale and consequence of global inequality is through a food systems lens. In a predominantly urban world, urban food systems present a useful lens to engage a wide variety of urban (and global) challenges—so called ‘wicked problems.’ This paper describes a collaborative research project between four urban food system research units, two European and two African. The project purpose was to seek out solutions to what lay between, across and within the different approaches applied in the understanding of each city’s food system challenges. Contextual differences and immediate (perceived) needs resulted in very different views on the nature of the challenge and the solutions required. Value positions of individuals and their disciplinary “enclaves” presented further boundaries. The paper argues that finding consensus provides false solutions. Rather the identification of novel approaches to such wicked problems is contingent of these differences being brought to the fore, being part of the conversation, as devices through which common positions can be discovered, where spaces are created for the realisation of new perspectives, but also, where difference is celebrated as opposed to censored.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?