Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Can Two Walk Together, Ex… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Can Two Walk Together, Except they be Agreed? Preliminary References and (the Erosion of) National Procedural Autonomy

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Anna Wallerman
Publicerad i European Law Review
Volym 44
Nummer/häfte 2
Sidor 159-177
ISSN 0307-5400
Publiceringsår 2019
Publicerad vid Juridiska institutionen
Centrum för Europaforskning (CERGU)
Sidor 159-177
Språk en
Ämnesord EU law; European Court of Justice; National courts; Procedure; References to European Court; Rules
Ämneskategorier Juridik (exklusive juridik och samhälle)

Sammanfattning

The Court of Justice’s case law on procedures and remedies before national courts has been highly scrutinised and often criticised, in particular for intruding on the procedural autonomy of the Member States. This article argues that the responsibility for such a development lies at least partially with the national courts. Drawing on an empirical analysis as well as in-depth case studies, the article shows that national courts requesting preliminary references from the Court often actively seek an answer promoting European integration over national autonomy. Furthermore, the analysis suggests that, when a national court assertively argues for the preservation of national procedural rules, it has a comparatively good chance of persuading the Court of Justice. The article concludes that there is still a case to be made for national procedural autonomy, but the success of that case depends upon the national courts’ use of the preliminary reference procedure.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?