Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän

Revisiting the etymology … - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Revisiting the etymology of the Nordic negative enclitic -a/-at

Working paper
Författare Eric Lander
Förlagsort Stockholm & Lund
Publiceringsår 2018
Publicerad vid Institutionen för svenska språket
Språk en
Länkar https://projekt.ht.lu.se/fileadmin/...
Ämnesord negation, etymology, Jespersen's Cycle, grammaticalization
Ämneskategorier Språk och litteratur


In this paper I present and discuss the etymological hypotheses that have been put forth through the years for Norse -a/-at ‘not’, a negative particle suffixed to finite and imperative verbs, found primarily in Old Icelandic and Old Norwegian. The four main etymologies that I will evaluate are: (i) the connector/generalizing particle PGmc *-(u)hw (cf. Go. -uh), (ii) the numeral for ‘one’: PGmc *aina/*ainat- (cf. Go. ain, ainata), (iii) a reinforcer associated with various pronouns: PGmc *-ã (cf. runic eka, ika, etc.) or perhaps PGmc *-ō̃ (cf. Go. þat-a, þana, in-a, OE þon-e, hin-e, etc.), and (iv) the (negative) indefinite phrases ‘(n)ever’ and ‘(n)ever a thing’: PGmc *(n-)aiwa-/*(n-)aiwa-weht-. As we shall see below, each etymology has its share of support from scholars. However, some ideas have aged better than others. Nevertheless, it is useful to discuss all of the proposals in the literature since there are conceptual overlaps and interrelated assumptions weaving their way through the hypotheses in (i-iv). The goal of this paper is to critically assess each of these etymologies, thereby giving an overview of their respective advantages and disadvantages.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?