Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Implant Survival in the E… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se
Just nu är det svårt att nå universitetet via telefon på grund av driftstörningar hos Tele2 - Felsökning pågår
Tisdag 25 juni 11:30

Implant Survival in the Edentulous Jaw: 30 Years of Experience. Part II: A Retro-Prospective Multivariate Regression Analysis Related to Treated Arch and Implant Surface Roughness

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Torsten Jemt
Publicerad i International Journal of Prosthodontics
Volym 31
Nummer/häfte 6
Sidor 531-539
ISSN 0893-2174
Publiceringsår 2018
Publicerad vid Institutionen för odontologi
Sidor 531-539
Språk en
Länkar dx.doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5883
Ämnesord retrospective analysis, peri-implantitis, failures, operations, Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Ämneskategorier Odontologi

Sammanfattning

Purpose: To report retro-prospective, long-term data on the prevalence of implant failures related to maxillary and mandibular arches and to different implant surfaces in a large number of edentulous patients. Materials and Methods: Altogether, 3,493 and 1,092 edentulous arches were consecutively treated with implants with turned (1986-2002) or moderately rough (2003-2015) surfaces, respectively, during two time periods at one referral clinic. All implant failures were consecutively identified during routine follow-up, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze implant failure related to arch and implant surface. Results: Overall cumulative survival rates (CSR) for arches treated with turned surface implants were 75.7% and 94.6% for the maxilla and mandible, respectively. The corresponding 10-year CSRs for arches treated with implants with a moderately rough surface were 91.9% and 96.1%, respectively. The strongest significant association (P < .05) with risk for implant failure was the maxilla, and this was more pronounced for implants with a turned surface. Age at surgery, implant surgeon, calendar year of surgery, and time of follow-up also had significant associations with risk of implant failure (P < .05). Conclusion: Risk for implant failure was significantly higher for treatment in the maxilla, but this risk was decreased significantly when using implants with a moderately rough surface. The impact of surface was not so obvious for treatment in the mandible. Risk for late implant failures after the first year was lower for implants with a moderately rough surface in the maxilla, but this risk seemed to be comparable for the different surfaces in the mandible.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?