Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

How do teachers interpret… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

How do teachers interpret and transform entrepreneurship education?

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Andreas Fejes
Mattias Nylund
Jessica Wallin
Publicerad i Journal of Curriculum Studies
Volym 51
Nummer/häfte 4
Sidor 554-566
ISSN 00220272
Publiceringsår 2019
Publicerad vid Institutionen för pedagogik och specialpedagogik
Sidor 554-566
Språk en
Länkar https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ful...
Ämnesord classification, curriculum, Entrepreneurship, framing, market relevance, vocational education
Ämneskategorier Pedagogik, Utbildningsvetenskap, Didaktik

Sammanfattning

During the last decade, entrepreneurship education has become a central curricular topic in many locations in the world. In Sweden, entrepreneurship education was implemented in the curriculum for the first time in 2011, as something that should be included in all upper secondary school programmes. In this article, we focus on one of these programmes, the handicraft programme, investigating how entrepreneurship education is formulated in the latest curriculum and how teachers understand and transform such content in their teaching. Drawing on Bernstein’s concepts of classification and framing, we illustrate how entrepreneurship education in the Swedish curriculum has a ‘dual definition’, representing very different framing and classification, but still clearly belongs in a ‘market relevance’ discourse. This is expressed through the way in which the concept is transformed by teachers in their teaching. We also find that entrepreneurship education has low legitimacy among teachers, particularly when it is classified weakly. The weak framing and classification, taken together with the low legitimacy among teachers, are likely to lead to very different transformations of entrepreneurship education in different educational contexts. In the long run, this could have a negative effect on the equivalence of teaching at upper secondary school.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?