Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Benefits and risks with a… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Benefits and risks with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and mesh support in immediate breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Håkan Hallberg
Svanheidur Rafnsdottir
Gennaro Selvaggi
Annika Strandell
Ola Samuelsson
Ida Stadig
Therese Svanberg
Emma Hansson
Richard Lewin
Publicerad i Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery
Volym 52
Nummer/häfte 3
Sidor 130-147
ISSN 2000-656X
Publiceringsår 2018
Publicerad vid Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för plastikkirurgi
Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper
Sidor 130-147
Språk en
Länkar https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.20...
Ämnesord aceullar dermal matrix, ADM, Breast reconstruction, implant, matrix, mesh, systematic review, tissue expander
Ämneskategorier Plastikkirurgi

Sammanfattning

In modern implant-based immediate breast reconstruction, it has become common to use biological acellular dermal and synthetic matrices in combination with a tissue expander or an implant. The aim of this systematic review was to examine differences in recurrence of cancer, impact on oncological treatment, health related quality of life, complications and aesthetic outcome between matrix and no matrix in immediate breast reconstruction. Systematic searches, data extraction and assessment of methodological quality were performed according to predetermined criteria. Fifty-one studies were eligible and included in the review. The certainty of evidence for overall complication rate and implant loss is low (GRADE ⊕⊕□ □). The certainty of evidence for delay of adjuvant treatment, implant loss, infection, capsular contraction and aesthetic outcome is very low (GRADE ⊕□ □ □). No study reported data on recurrence of cancer or health related quality of life. In conclusion, there is a lack of high quality studies that compare the use of matrix with no matrix in immediate breast reconstruction. Specifically, there are no data on risk of recurrence of cancer, delay of adjuvant treatment and Health related quality of life (HRQoL). In addition, there is a risk of bias in many studies. It is often unclear what complications have been included and how they have been diagnosed, and how and when capsular contracture and aesthetic outcome have been evaluated. Controlled trials that further analyse the impact of radiotherapy, type of matrix and type of procedure (one or two stages) are necessary.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?