Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

On the use of a six-level… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

On the use of a six-level scale for physical activity

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Gunnar Grimby
Kerstin Frändin
Publicerad i Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Volym 28
Nummer/häfte 3
Sidor 819-825
ISSN 0905-7188
Publiceringsår 2018
Publicerad vid Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi, sektionen för hälsa och rehabilitering
Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi, sektionen för klinisk neurovetenskap
Sidor 819-825
Språk en
Ämnesord elderly, leisure-time, physical activity, questionnaire, validation, randomized-controlled-trial, fear-avoidance beliefs, frail, elderly-people, older-people, nutritional intervention, activity, questionnaires, muscle strength, back-pain, follow-up, age, Sport Sciences
Ämneskategorier Gerontologi, medicinsk/hälsovetenskaplig inriktning

Sammanfattning

The 4-level questionnaire to assess leisure-time physical activity (PA) originally described by Saltin and Grimby has been extended to a 6 (or 7)-level questionnaire, especially for the elderly or other persons with a low level of PA, expanded to include household activities. There are currently two main versions, one used in Swedish, Danish, and Norwegian studies, and one with further modifications used in Finnish studies. In this review, predictive validity for mortality and different aspects of physical performance are demonstrated. In a study regarding concurrent validity in one of the Finnish versions, significant correlations with accelerometer-based PA variables are shown. The scale has been used in a number of studies concerning effects of different types of intervention, such as physical training and increased PA, or to describe the PA level in the studied cohort. In presenting and analyzing the data, different combinations of PA levels have been used. As there are major differences between the versions, validity studies cannot easily be transformed between them. Thus, it is suggested that a common consensus be reached with respect to details of the questionnaire.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?