Till startsida
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Land use of drained peatlands: Greenhouse gas fluxes, plant production, and economics

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Åsa Kasimir
Hongxing He
Jessica Coria
Anna Nordén
Publicerad i Global Change Biology
ISSN 13541013
Publiceringsår 2017
Publicerad vid Institutionen för geovetenskaper
Institutionen för nationalekonomi med statistik, Enheten för miljöekonomi
Göteborgs miljövetenskapliga centrum, GMV
Språk en
Länkar onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111...
Ämnesord CO2, CH4, Cost-benefit analysis, CoupModel, N2O, Norway spruce, Reed canary grass, Soil water table depth, Willow
Ämneskategorier Nationalekonomi, Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap, Ekologi, Klimatforskning


© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Drained peatlands are hotspots for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which could be mitigated by rewetting and land use change. We performed an ecological/economic analysis of rewetting drained fertile peatlands in a hemiboreal climate using different land use strategies over 80 years. Vegetation, soil processes, and total GHG emissions were modeled using the CoupModel for four scenarios: (1) business as usual-Norway spruce with average soil water table of -40 cm; (2) willow with groundwater at -20 cm; (3) reed canary grass with groundwater at -10 cm; and (4) a fully rewetted peatland. The predictions were based on previous model calibrations with several high-resolution datasets consisting of water, heat, carbon, and nitrogen cycling. Spruce growth was calibrated by tree-ring data that extended the time period covered. The GHG balance of four scenarios, including vegetation and soil, were 4.7, 7.1, 9.1, and 6.2 Mg CO 2 eq ha -1 year -1 , respectively. The total soil emissions (including litter and peat respiration CO 2 + N 2 O + CH 4 ) were 33.1, 19.3, 15.3, and 11.0 Mg CO 2 eq ha -1 year -1 , respectively, of which the peat loss contributed 35%, 24%, and 7% of the soil emissions for the three drained scenarios, respectively. No peat was lost for the wet peatland. It was also found that draining increases vegetation growth, but not as drastically as peat respiration does. The cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is sensitive to time frame, discount rate, and carbon price. Our results indicate that the net benefit was greater with a somewhat higher soil water table and when the peatland was vegetated with willow and reed canary grass (Scenarios 2 and 3). We conclude that saving peat and avoiding methane release using fairly wet conditions can significantly reduce GHG emissions, and that this strategy should be considered for land use planning and policy-making.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?