Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän

Scholasticism, Fair Value… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Scholasticism, Fair Value and Ursury, According to Odd Langholm

Författare Sten Jönsson
Thomas Polesie
Publiceringsår 2017
Publicerad vid Företagsekonomiska institutionen
Gothenburg Research Institute (GRI)
Språk en
Länkar hdl.handle.net/2077/54213
Ämnesord Fair value, scholasticism, usury, free will, Langholm
Ämneskategorier Företagsekonomi


Odd Langholm, a prominent Scandinavian scholar of early economic thought, provides us with cues on how to re-consider the fundamental assumptions that go into economic valuation and modelling. “Fair value” was not controversial among the scholastics. A thing is obviously worth what it can be sold for! Problems arise when the parties to a contract disagree – when the market is too thin to produce a fair price. Use a model, and/or give an account of how you calculated, is today’s solution. The scholastics, not yet accustomed to econometric models, assumed that contracts are entered into by competent individuals with free will, and given that money, the counting medium, has no intrinsic value (it is worth what is stamped on the coin), it follows that a contract including interest is not valid. The free will of either party must have been infringed upon. Be it by fraud, force, or ignorance. Odd Langholm informs us about how the idea of the depersonalized market as a system that produces prices, “fair values”, emerged. The problem is not so much how scholastics contributed to current ideas on valuation but what was lost on the way.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?