Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Innovative intraoral cooling device better tolerated and equally effective as ice cooling.

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Java Walladbegi
Martin Gellerstedt
Anncarin Svanberg
Mats Jontell
Publicerad i Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology
Volym 80
Nummer/häfte 5
Sidor 965-972
ISSN 1432-0843
Publiceringsår 2017
Publicerad vid Institutionen för odontologi
Sidor 965-972
Språk en
Länkar dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-017-3434-...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.f...
Ämneskategorier Odontologi, Hematologi

Sammanfattning

Most of the patients who receive myeloablative therapy prior to stem cell transplantation develop oral mucositis (OM). This adverse reaction manifests as oral mucosal erythema and ulcerations and may require high doses of morphine for pain alleviation. OM may also interfere with food intake and result in weight loss, a need for parenteral nutrition, and impaired quality of life. To date, there have been very few studies of evidence-based interventions for the prevention of OM. Cryotherapy, using ice chips, has been shown to reduce in an efficient manner the severity and extent of OM, although clinical applications are still limited due to several shortcomings, such as adverse tooth sensations, problems with infectious organisms in the water, nausea, and uneven cooling of the oral mucosa. The present proof-of-concept study was conducted to compare the tolerability, temperature reduction, and cooling distribution profiles of an intra-oral cooling device and ice chips in healthy volunteers who did not receive myeloablative treatment, and therefore, did not experience the symptoms of OM.Twenty healthy volunteers used the cooling device and ice chips for a maximum of 60 min each, using a cross-over design. The baseline and final temperatures were measured at eight intra-oral locations using an infra-red thermographic camera. The thermographic images were analysed using two digital software packages. A questionnaire was used to assess the tolerability levels of the two interventions.The intra-oral cooling device was significantly better tolerated than the ice-chips (p = 0.0118). The two interventions were equally effective regarding temperature reduction and cooling distribution.The intra-oral cooling device shows superior tolerability in healthy volunteers. Furthermore, this study shows that temperature reduction and cooling distribution are achieved equally well using either method.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?