Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän

Norm-critical pedagogy – … - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Norm-critical pedagogy – methods, resistance and learning by mistakes

Konferensbidrag (offentliggjort, men ej förlagsutgivet)
Författare Inger Kjellberg
Publicerad i Social Work Education in Europe: towards 2025, Milan, Italy 29th June - 2nd July
Publiceringsår 2015
Publicerad vid Institutionen för socialt arbete
Språk en
Ämnesord norm-critical pedagogy, social work
Ämneskategorier Pedagogiskt arbete


In this paper I will discuss norm-critical pedagogy and the challenges of maintaining a critical approach to norm shaping processes in the classroom. Norm-critical pedagogy is grounded in the assumption that both students and teachers are taking part in the construction of social norms and are influenced by difference-shaping categories. The question of how to manage conflicts of power, group stereotyping and normative opinions in the classroom is highlighted with examples from a course on power relations and categorisations in the social work programme in Sweden. The course aims at questioning privilege and normative categorisation as well as to advocate a critique and transformation of hegemonic structures and ideologies. Different methods and strategies of challenging group stereotyping used in the course are explained and discussed. A self-assessment exercise was introduced in class to make the students aware of their own privileges and their experiences of friction in relation to gender, sexuality, skin colour, ethnic background, class, age, functional ability and body size. This exercise also made visible the blind spots in the group and the homogeneity of experiences shaping the discussions in class. The methods and strategies used evoked feelings of resentment and anger. The starting point for the discussion is that crisis in the classroom are a way of learning how norms are shaped and reproduced. The risk of simply reinforcing the binary use of ”us” and ”them” when considering group stereotyping is addressed through a reflection of the mistakes made during the teaching sessions. Mistakes are viewed as a resource in teaching which can help to form strategies and prevent problematic situations. The mistakes also indicate the teacher's participation in the reproduction of social norms.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?