Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Why I Act Differently: St… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Why I Act Differently: Studying Patterns of Legitimation Among CIOs Through Motive Talk

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Johan Magnusson
Bendik Bygstad
Publicerad i Information Technology and People
Volym 26
Nummer/häfte 3
ISSN 0959-3845
Publiceringsår 2013
Publicerad vid Centrum för affärssystem (CFA)
Företagsekonomiska institutionen
Företagsekonomiska institutionen, Redovisning
Språk en
Länkar dx.doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2012-0117
https://gup.ub.gu.se/file/113367
Ämnesord IT Governance, IS professionals, Institutional theory, behavior, speech act theory, motive talk
Ämneskategorier Ekonomi och näringsliv, Företagsekonomi

Sammanfattning

Purpose – IT Governance has become the recognized norm system for Chief Information Officers. The purpose of this paper is to understand how CIOs relate to these norms, by studying how they legitimate incompliance with the norms. Design/methodology/approach – An interpretive, qualitative, structured interview study with 18 CIOs in large Swedish organizations regarded as having excellent IT Governance practice, using Motive Talk as analytical lens to identify the informants’ relationship to norms. Findings – The study identifies norm-specific patterns for how CIOs legitimate incompliance with IT Governance, finding that CIOs use a combination of excuse and justifications as strategies of legitimation. The study also finds that CIOs display a tendency of not contesting IT Governance related norms unless these are in conflict with neighboring professional jurisdictions. This is regarded as an identification of the ‘margins’ of IT Governance. Research limitations/implications – The study illustrates how the theory of Motive Talk is a viable road ahead for future studies of IT professionals. The generalizability of the identified patterns of legitimation is limited by the selection of large organizations with solely male CIOs, as well as the selection of solely organizations that have succeeded in establishing external legitimacy concerning IT Governance and the organizations being Swedish. Practical implications – CIOs aspiring to increase their legitimacy should avoid direct conflicts with neighboring professions. In addition to this, they should also aspire to be clear in a separation of motive talk and actual practice, since full norm compliance may be detrimental to their factual operations. Originality/value – The originality of this paper lies in the methodological approach of combining motive talk and speech acts to investigate CIO legitimation practices. Keywords – IT Governance, IS professionals, Institutional theory, behavior, speech act theory, motive talk Paper type – Research paper

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?