Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Which Decision-Making Arr… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Which Decision-Making Arrangements Generate the Strongest Legitimacy Beliefs? Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Peter Esaiasson
Mikael Gilljam
Mikael J Persson
Publicerad i European Journal of Political Research
Volym 51
Nummer/häfte 6
Sidor 785-808
ISSN 1475-6765
Publiceringsår 2012
Publicerad vid Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
Sidor 785-808
Språk en
Länkar dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011...
Ämnesord democratic decision making; legitimacy beliefs; participatory constitution making; participatory democracy; procedural fairness; randomised field experiments
Ämneskategorier Övrig annan samhällsvetenskap

Sammanfattning

How can democracies satisfy citizens' demands for legitimate decision making? This article reports findings from a randomised field experiment designed to mimic decision making in large-scale democracies. Natural collectives of individuals with a shared history and future (high school classes) were studied. They were asked to make a decision about how to spend a sum of money under arrangements imposed by the researchers and distributed randomly across classes. Within this setting, empirical support for three ideas about legitimacy enhancing decision-making arrangements is tested: participatory constitution-making; personal involvement in the decision-making process; and fairness in the implementation of arrangements. Throughout the analyses it was found that personal involvement is the main factor generating legitimacy beliefs.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?