Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän

Rock Art as Secondary Age… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Rock Art as Secondary Agent? Society and Agency in Bronze Age Bohuslän

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Johan Ling
Per Cornell
Publicerad i Norwegian Archaeological Review
Volym 43
Nummer/häfte 1
Sidor 26-43
ISSN 0029-3652
Publiceringsår 2010
Publicerad vid Institutionen för historiska studier
Sidor 26-43
Språk en
Länkar dx.doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2010.48...
Ämnesord Rock art, Agency, Maritime, Warriors
Ämneskategorier Arkeologi


During the major part of the 20th century the rock art in Bohuslän has been seen as a manifestation of an agrarian ‘cultic’ ideology in the landscape. In this context the dominant ship image and the armed humans have been perceived as abstract religious icons, not as active symbols related to real praxis in the landscape. Moreover, some scholars claim that the rock-art medium was utilized primarily by society’s elites. In this paper we intend to challenge some of these ideas and try to show that they do not correspond to the key notions about Bronze Age society that most scholars today seem to support. Thus, rock art cannot be explained and understood solely by broad ideas about how cosmology, mythology and/or religion were constituted during the Bronze Age. We will instead argue for a more active function for rock art, and the fact that some of the depictions may have worked as ‘secondary agents’ in the landscape. For this argument, the general maritime location, content and the dominant masculine representation of armed humans related to the ship images are important elements. INTRODUCTION Chiefs, goods, commoners, farmers, pastoralists, Indo Europeans, druids, metal smiths and warriors, the list could have been made even longer than this, but it concludes the major interpretative trends, over the years, dealing with issues of the agency of rock art in Bohuslän. For most of the 20th century the rock art in Bohuslän was pictured by researchers in terms of a cultic agrarian ideology in the landscape whereas the dominant ship images and the armed humans were perceived as abstract religious icons, not as active symbols that related to real praxis in the landscape (Almgren 1927, Fredell 2003). But, if the rock-art ship and the armed humans were such strong religious symbols during the Bronze Age, why were they not depicted and dispersed

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?