Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän

Stability Evaluation of I… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Stability Evaluation of Implants Integrated in Grafted and Nongrafted Maxillary Bone: A Clinical Study from Implant Placement to Abutment Connection.

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Lars Rasmusson
Andreas Thor
Lars Sennerby
Publicerad i Clinical implant dentistry and related research
Volym Mars 14
Nummer/häfte 1
Sidor 61-66
ISSN 1708-8208
Publiceringsår 2012
Publicerad vid Institutionen för odontologi
Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för biomaterialvetenskap
Sidor 61-66
Språk en
Länkar dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010...
Ämneskategorier Biomaterial, Oral protetik


ABSTRACT Background: Clinical studies have shown a higher degree of implant failures in grafted bone compared with normal nongrafted maxillary bone. Additionally, a prolonged time for integration of titanium implants in grafted block bone has been shown by means of resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to compare the stability of implants placed in particulate bone, onlay block bone, interpositional bone, and nongrafted maxillary bone during the early phase of osseointegration using RFA and implant failure. Material and Methods: Thirty-five patients with edentulism in the maxilla were included in the study. In all, 260 Astra Tech TiOblast implants (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) were installed. Twenty-five of these patients had severe maxillary atrophy and were treated with iliac bone grafts 5 to 6 months prior to implant placement, 19 with lateral onlay block grafts on one side (group A, 38 implants) and particulate bone for lateral augmentation on the other (group B, 38 implants). These 19 patients also got bilateral sinus floor augmentation with particulate bone (group C, 76 implants). Six patients had an unfavorable sagittal relation between the jaws and underwent a LeFort I operation with interpositional bone blocks grafted to the nasal and sinus floors (group D, 48 implants). The remaining 10 patients could be treated with implants without bone augmentation and served as control (group E, 60 implants). RFA was performed at implant placement and abutment connection 6 months later and an implant stability quotient (ISQ) value was given for each implant. Results: Four implants (1.5%) were found mobile at abutment connection and removed (two in group A and two in group D). RFA showed a slight increase in stability from installation to abutment connection but the differences were not statistically significant in any of the groups (Wilcoxon signed rank test for comparison of paired data). Implants installed in group D had a significantly lower ISQ value at both measurements compared with the other groups (Wilcoxon Rank Sum test for comparisons of independent samples, p = .05). Conclusion: It is concluded that TiO(2)-blasted implants placed in nongrafted and grafted maxillary bone using a two-staged protocol show similar stability during the early phase of osseointegration. Patients reconstructed with interpositional bone graft after a LeFort I osteotomy showed lower implant stability values than nongrafted patients and other grafting techniques.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?