Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Mentally disordered crimi… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Mentally disordered criminal offenders in the Swedish criminal system

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Christer Svennerlind
Thomas Nilsson
Nora Kerekes
Peter Andiné
Margareta Lagerkvist
Anders Forsman
Henrik Anckarsäter
Helge Malmgren
Publicerad i International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Volym 33
Nummer/häfte 4
Sidor 220-226
ISSN 0160-2527
Publiceringsår 2010
Publicerad vid Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi, sektionen för psykiatri och neurokemi
Institutionen för filosofi, lingvistik och vetenskapsteori
Sidor 220-226
Språk en
Länkar dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.0...
Ämnesord Swedish model, Accountability, Severe mental disorder, Criminal Law, history, Criminals, psychology, Forensic Psychiatry, History, 20th Century, Humans, Mental Competency, legislation & jurisprudence, Mental Disorders, therapy, Prisoners, psychology, Punishment, Risk Assessment, Sweden
Ämneskategorier Idé- o lärdomshistoria, Psykiatri, Straffrätt, Medicinens historia, Praktisk filosofi, Teoretisk filosofi

Sammanfattning

Historically, the Swedish criminal justice system conformed to other Western penal law systems, exempting severely mentally disordered offenders considered to be unaccountable. However, in 1965 Sweden enforced a radical penal law abolishing exceptions based on unaccountability. Mentally disordered offenders have since then been subjected to various forms of sanctions motivated by the offender's need for care and aimed at general prevention. Until 2008, a prison sentence was not allowed for offenders found to have committed a crime under the influence of a severe mental disorder, leaving forensic psychiatric care the most common sanction in this group. Such offenders are nevertheless held criminally responsible, liable for damages, and encumbered with a criminal record. In most cases, such offenders must not be discharged without the approval of an administrative court. Two essentially modern principles may be discerned behind the “Swedish model”: first, an attempted abolishment of moral responsibility, omitting concepts such as guilt, accountability, atonement, and retribution, and, second, the integration of psychiatric care into the societal reaction and control systems. The model has been much criticized, and several governmental committees have suggested a re-introduction of a system involving the concept of accountability. This review describes the Swedish special criminal justice provisions on mentally disordered offenders including the legislative changes in 1965 along with current proposals to return to a pre-1965 system, presents current Swedish forensic psychiatric practice and research, and discusses some of the ethical, political, and metaphysical presumptions that underlie the current system.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?