Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

The choice of institution… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

The choice of institutions to solve cooperation problems: a survey of experimental research

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Astrid Dannenberg
C. Gallier
Publicerad i Experimental Economics
Sidor 34
ISSN 1386-4157
Publiceringsår 2019
Publicerad vid Institutionen för nationalekonomi med statistik
Sidor 34
Språk en
Länkar dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-019-09629...
Ämnesord Literature review, Experiments, Cooperation, Public goods, Endogenous, institutional choice, Voting, public-goods, minimum participation, collective choice, tax evasion, punishment, provision, coalitions, sanctions, rules, game
Ämneskategorier Nationalekonomi

Sammanfattning

A growing experimental literature studies the endogenous choice of institutions to solve cooperation problems arising in prisoners' dilemmas, public goods games, and common pool resource games. Participants in these experiments have the opportunity to influence the rules of the game before they play the game. In this paper, we review the experimental literature of the last 20 years on the choice of institutions and describe what has been learned about the quality and the determinants of institutional choice. Cooperative subjects and subjects with optimistic beliefs about others often vote in favor of the institution. Almost all institutions improve cooperation if they are implemented, but they are not always implemented by the players. Institutional costs, remaining free-riding incentives, and a lack of learning opportunities are identified as the most important barriers. Unresolved cooperation problems, like global climate change, are often characterized by these barriers. The experimental results also show that cooperation tends to be higher under endogenously chosen institutions than exogenously imposed institutions. However, a significant share of players fails to implement the institution and they often perform poorly, which is why we cannot conclude that letting people choose is better than enforcing institutions from outside.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?