Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Scandcleft Project, Trial… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Scandcleft Project, Trial 1: Comparison of Speech Outcome in Relation to Timing of Hard Palate Closure in 5-Year-Olds With UCLP.

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Elisabeth Willadsen
Anette Lohmander
Christina Persson
Maria Boers
Mia Kisling-Møller
Christina Havstam
Anna Elander
Mikael Andersen
Publicerad i The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
Volym 56
Nummer/häfte 10
Sidor 1276-1286
ISSN 1545-1569
Publiceringsår 2019
Publicerad vid Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi, sektionen för hälsa och rehabilitering
Sidor 1276-1286
Språk en
Länkar dx.doi.org/10.1177/1055665619854632
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.f...
Ämnesord 2-stage procedure; RCT; consonant proficiency; velopharyngeal function
Ämneskategorier Plastikkirurgi, Logopedi och foniatrik

Sammanfattning

To compare in-depth speech results in Scandcleft Trial 1 as well as reference data from peers without cleft palate (CP).A prospective randomized clinical trial.A Danish and a Swedish CP center.143 of 148 randomized 5-year-olds with unilateral cleft lip and palate. All received lip and velum closure at 4 months, and hard palate closure at 12 months (arm A) or 36 months (arm B).A composite measure based on velopharyngeal competence (VPC) or velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI), an overall assessment of VPC from connected speech (VPC-Rate), Percentage of Consonants Correct (PCC-score), and consonant errors. Speech therapy visits, average hearing thresholds, and secondary pharyngeal surgeries documented burden of treatment.Across the trial, 61.5% demonstrated VPC and 38.5% VPI. Twenty-two percent of participants achieved age appropriate PCC-scores. There were no statistically significant differences between arms or centers for these measures. In the Danish center, arm B: achieved lower PCC-scores (P = .01); obtained PCC-scores without s-errors below 79% (P = .002); produced ≥3 active oral cleft speech characteristics (P = .004) than arm A. In both centers, arm B attended more speech visits.At age 5, differences between centers and treatment arms were not statistically significant for VPC/VPI, but consonant proficiency differed between treatment arms in the Danish center. Poor speech outcomes were seen for both treatment arms. Variations between centers were observed. As the Swedish center had few participants, intercenter comparisons should be interpreted with caution.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?