Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

A scoping review of inter… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

A scoping review of interventions for preventing and countering violent extremism: Current status and implications for future research

Forskningsöversiktsartikel
Författare Isabella Pistone
Erik Eriksson
Ulrika Beckman
Christer Mattsson
Morten Sager
Publicerad i Journal for deradicalization
Nummer/häfte 19
Sidor 1-84
ISSN 2363-9849
Publiceringsår 2019
Publicerad vid Segerstedtinstitutet
Institutionen för filosofi, lingvistik och vetenskapsteori
Sidor 1-84
Språk en
Länkar journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/art...
Ämnesord Scoping Review; Violent Extremism, Prevention, Countering, Intervention, Radicalization
Ämneskategorier Annan samhällsvetenskap, Utbildningsvetenskap, Annan humaniora

Sammanfattning

The growth of counter-terrorism efforts has been reported in a number of scholarly studies. These studies have also reported a shift in efforts to prevent future terrorism towards targeting potential future terrorists and preventing them from becoming radicalized, particularly in the Western world. The importance of evidence-based interventions is commonly stressed in the policy processes involved in installing interventions that have the aim of countering/preventing violent extremism (C/PVE). However, there is a lack of knowledge about the state of the evidence for interventions within this field. The objective of this scoping review was to map the evidence base for P/CVE interventions as reported in scholarly studies. We searched multiple databases using search terms related to violent extremism, terrorism and prevention to assess the research describing interventions for C/PVE. A total of 111 publications were included in the study. The interventions identified were most commonly implemented at the national level. Only 38 publications mentioned any kind of outcome and only two publications evaluated the comparative effectiveness of the interventions. The outcomes evaluated were knowledge and attitudes - outcomes without direct relevance for C/PVE. In conclusion, there is a lack of evidence-based interventions that focus on C/PVE. Future research should focus on evaluating the comparative effectiveness of outcomes that are relevant to C/PVE in order to fill this knowledge gap.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?