Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

The Analysis of Nonverbal… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

The Analysis of Nonverbal Communication: The Dangers of Pseudoscience in Security and Justice Contexts

Forskningsöversiktsartikel
Författare Vincent Denault
Pierrich Plusquellec
Louise M. Jupe
Michel St-Yves
Norah E. Dunbar
Maria Hartwig
Siegfried L. Sporer
Jessica Rioux-Turcotte
Jonathan Jarry
Dave Walsh
Henry Otgaar
Andrei Viziteu
Victoria Talwar
David A. Keatley
Iris Blandón-Gitlin
Clint Townson
Nadine Deslauriers-Varin
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Miles L. Patterson
Igor Areh
Alfred Allan
Hilary Evans Cameron
Rémi Boivin
Leanne ten Brinke
Jaume Masip
Ray Bull
Mireille Cyr
Lorraine Hope
Leif Strömwall
Stephanie J. Bennett
Faisal Al Menaiya
Richard A. Leo
Annelies Vredeveldt
Marty Laforest
Charles R. Honts
Antonio L. Manzanero
Samantha Mann
Pär-Anders Granhag
Karl Ask
Fiona Gabbert
Jean-Pierre Guay
Alexandre Coutant
Jeffrey Hancock
Valerie Manusov
Judee K. Burgoon
Steven M. Kleinman
Gordon Wright
Sara Landström
Ian Freckelton
Zarah Vernham
Peter J. van Koppen
Publicerad i Anuario de Psicología Jurídica
ISSN 1133-0740
Publiceringsår 2019
Publicerad vid Psykologiska institutionen
Språk en
Länkar https://journals.copmadrid.org/apj/...
Ämnesord Pseudoscience, Nonverbal communication, SPOT, Behavior analysis interview, Synergology
Ämneskategorier Tillämpad psykologi

Sammanfattning

For security and justice professionals (e.g., police officers, lawyers, judges), the thousands of peer-reviewed articles on nonverbal communication represent important sources of knowledge. However, despite the scope of the scientific work carried out on this subject, professionals can turn to programs, methods, and approaches that fail to reflect the state of science. The objective of this article is to examine (i) concepts of nonverbal communication conveyed by these programs, methods, and approaches, but also (ii) the consequences of their use (e.g., on the life or liberty of individuals). To achieve this objective, we describe the scope of scientific research on nonverbal communication. A program (SPOT; Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques), a method (the BAI; Behavior Analysis Interview) and an approach (synergology) that each run counter to the state of science are examined. Finally, we outline five hypotheses to explain why some organizations in the fields of security and justice are turning to pseudoscience and pseudoscientific techniques. We conclude the article by inviting these organizations to work with the international community of scholars who have scientific expertise in nonverbal communication and lie (and truth) detection to implement evidence-based practices.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?