Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Can reality monitoring cr… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Can reality monitoring criteria distinguish between true and false intentions?

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Erik Mac Giolla
Karl Ask
Pär-Anders Granhag
Annica Karlsson
Publicerad i Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Volym 8
Sidor 92-97
ISSN 2211-3681
Publiceringsår 2019
Publicerad vid Psykologiska institutionen
Sidor 92-97
Språk en
Länkar https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.20...
Ämnesord Deception, Lie detection, Reality monitoring, True and false intentions
Ämneskategorier Tillämpad psykologi, Psykologi

Sammanfattning

The current study examines the potential for the verbal deception detection tool reality monitoring (RM) to distinguish between statements of true and false intentions. Truth tellers (n = 50) honestly described a future trip they were to go on. Liars (n = 50) described a future trip that they claimed, but were in fact not, to go on. Their statements were subsequently coded according to twelve RM criteria. Six of the criteria virtually never occurred in either truthful or deceptive statements. The remaining six criteria showed on average a substantial difference between truth tellers and liars (average Hedges’ g = 0.84). However, a closer examination indicates that this effect was driven largely by four RM criteria (cognitive operations, clarity, reconstructability, and realism). These four criteria could form the starting point in the development of a credibility assessment tool tailored to distinguish between true and false intentions.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?