Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Audiometric Comparison Be… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Audiometric Comparison Between the First Patients With the Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant and Matched Percutaneous Bone Anchored Hearing Device Users

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Cristina Rigato
Sabine Reinfeldt
Bo Håkansson
Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson
M. K. S. Hol
Måns Eeg-Olofsson
Publicerad i Otology & Neurotology
Volym 37
Nummer/häfte 9
Sidor 1381-1387
ISSN 1531-7129
Publiceringsår 2016
Publicerad vid Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för öron-, näs- och halssjukdomar
Sidor 1381-1387
Språk en
Länkar dx.doi.org/10.1097/mao.000000000000...
Ämnesord Active transcutaneous, Audiometric measurements, Bone anchored hearing aid, Bone conduction, aid benefit, noise, stimulation, sound
Ämneskategorier Etologi, Bioinformatik och systembiologi

Sammanfattning

Hypothesis:The transcutaneous bone conduction implant (BCI) is compared with bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs) under the hypothesis that the BCI can give similar rehabilitation from an audiological as well as patient-related point of view.Background:Patients suffering from conductive and mixed hearing losses can often benefit more from rehabilitation using bone conduction devices (BCDs) rather than conventional air conduction devices. The most widely used BCD is the percutaneous BAHA, with a permanent skin-penetrating abutment. To overcome issues related to percutaneous BCDs, the trend today is to develop transcutaneous devices, with intact skin. The BCI is an active transcutaneous device currently in a clinical trial phase. A potential limitation of active transcutaneous devices is the loss of power in the induction link over the skin. To address this issue, countermeasures are taken in the design of the BCI, which is therefore expected to be as effective as percutaneous BCDs.Methods:An early observational study with a matched-pair design was performed to compare BCI and BAHA groups of patients over several audiometric measurements, including speech audiometry and warble tones thresholds with and without the device. Additionally, questionnaires were used to assess the general health condition, benefit, and satisfaction level of patients.Results:No statistically significant difference was detected in any of the audiological measurements. The outcome of patient-related measurements was slightly superior for BCI in all subscales.Conclusion:Results confirm the initial hypothesis of the study: the BCI seems to be capable of providing as good rehabilitation as percutaneous devices for indicated patients.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?