Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Patchy field sampling bia… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Patchy field sampling biases understanding of climate change impacts across the Arctic

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Daniel B. Metcalfe
Thirze D.G. Hermans
Jenny Ahlstrand
Michael Becker
Martin Berggren
Robert G. Björk
Mats P. Björkman
Daan Blok
Nitin Chaudhary
Chelsea Chisholm
Aimée T. Classen
Niles J. Hasselquist
Micael Jonsson
Jeppe A. Kristensen
Bright B. Kumordzi
Hanna Lee
Jordan R. Mayor
Janet Prevéy
Karolina Pantazatou
Johannes Rousk
Ryan A. Sponseller
Maja K. Sundqvist
Jing Tang
Johan Uddling
Göran Wallin
Wenxin Zhang
Anders Ahlström
David E. Tenenbaum
Abdulhakim M. Abdi
Publicerad i Nature Ecology and Evolution
Volym 2
Nummer/häfte 9
Sidor 1443–1448
Publiceringsår 2018
Publicerad vid Institutionen för geovetenskaper
Institutionen för biologi och miljövetenskap
Sidor 1443–1448
Språk en
Länkar doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0612-5
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Ämneskategorier Biologiska vetenskaper, Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap

Sammanfattning

© 2018 The Author(s) Effective societal responses to rapid climate change in the Arctic rely on an accurate representation of region-specific ecosystem properties and processes. However, this is limited by the scarcity and patchy distribution of field measurements. Here, we use a comprehensive, geo-referenced database of primary field measurements in 1,840 published studies across the Arctic to identify statistically significant spatial biases in field sampling and study citation across this globally important region. We find that 31% of all study citations are derived from sites located within 50 km of just two research sites: Toolik Lake in the USA and Abisko in Sweden. Furthermore, relatively colder, more rapidly warming and sparsely vegetated sites are under-sampled and under-recognized in terms of citations, particularly among microbiology-related studies. The poorly sampled and cited areas, mainly in the Canadian high-Arctic archipelago and the Arctic coastline of Russia, constitute a large fraction of the Arctic ice-free land area. Our results suggest that the current pattern of sampling and citation may bias the scientific consensuses that underpin attempts to accurately predict and effectively mitigate climate change in the region. Further work is required to increase both the quality and quantity of sampling, and incorporate existing literature from poorly cited areas to generate a more representative picture of Arctic climate change and its environmental impacts.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?

Denna text är utskriven från följande webbsida:
http://www.gu.se/forskning/publikation/?publicationId=269196
Utskriftsdatum: 2019-08-18