Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Taking the stand: Defenda… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Taking the stand: Defendant statements in court cases of alleged sexual abuse against infants, toddlers and preschoolers

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Mikaela Magnusson
Emelie Ernberg
Sara Landström
Pär-Anders Granhag
Publicerad i Psychology, Crime and Law
Volym 24
Nummer/häfte 7
Sidor 744-759
ISSN 1068-316X
Publiceringsår 2018
Publicerad vid Psykologiska institutionen
Sidor 744-759
Språk en
Länkar www.tandfonline.com/eprint/PTPqZXxc...
Ämnesord Admission of guilt, confession, legal decision-making, child sexual abuse, courtroom
Ämneskategorier Tillämpad psykologi, Psykologi

Sammanfattning

Investigating and adjudicating allegations of child sexual abuse are challenging tasks. In the present study, we examined defendant statements concerning charges of sexual abuse against young children in Swedish district court cases (87 defendants, 140 child complainants, tried between January 2010 to December 2015). A main objective was to test predictive factors for admissions of guilt using inferential statistical analyses. Furthermore, using qualitative thematical analysis, we sought to identify common patterns in the defendants’ explanations to the allegation. Approximately one-third of the defendants (31%) pleaded guilty during trial. Admissions of guilt were more likely if the defendant was young, if the child was young at the onset of abuse, if the child and perpetrator had an extrafamilial relationship, and if the defendant possessed child pornography. A conflict with the person who made the report (e.g. a custody dispute), a testimony from the child, a direct eyewitness, or an informal disclosure recipient were significantly more common in cases of denials. In the qualitative analysis, a range of alternative explanations behind the abuse allegations were identified. Legal professionals and investigators may benefit from considering these alternative hypotheses during their investigative and judicial work.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?

Denna text är utskriven från följande webbsida:
http://www.gu.se/forskning/publikation/?publicationId=263415
Utskriftsdatum: 2019-07-21