To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Oral implant surfaces: Pa… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
To content Read more about how we use cookies on

Oral implant surfaces: Part 2--review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces

Journal article
Authors Tomas Albrektsson
Ann Wennerberg
Published in Int J Prosthodont
Volume 17
Issue 5
Pages 544-64
Publication year 2004
Published at Institute of Surgical Sciences, Department of Biomaterials
Institute of Odontology, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Technology
Pages 544-64
Language en
Keywords Bone Transplantation, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, *Dental Implants, *Dental Prosthesis Design, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Osseointegration, Prospective Studies, Randomized Controlled Trials, Retrospective Studies, Surface Properties
Subject categories Dentistry


PURPOSE: This article reviews clinical knowledge of selected oral implant surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The surfaces most commonly used in clinical practice, marketed by the five largest oral implant companies, are identified; their clinical documentation was scrutinized following a strict protocol. Experimental knowledge of the surfaces is briefly summarized. Retrospective, prospective, and comparative clinical studies were analyzed separately, as were studies of implants in conjunction with bone grafts. RESULTS: TiUnite anodized surfaces are clinically documented in 1- to 2-year follow-up studies at best, with failures at about 3%. Sandblasted and acid-etched SLA surfaces are documented with good clinical results for up to 3 years. Osseotite dual acid-etched implants are documented with good clinical results for up to 5 years. Frialit-2 sandblasted and etched implants are positively documented for about 3 years in one study only. The Tioblast implant is the only design documented for survival over 10 years of follow-up and success over 7 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Generally, oral implants are introduced clinically without adequate clinical documentation. Implant companies initiate clinical documentation after product launch. The standards of clinical reporting have improved over the years. Proper long-term reports have been published for only one surface, Tioblast.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?