To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Prevalence of low back pa… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Prevalence of low back pain and sickness absence: a "borderline" study in Norway and Sweden

Journal article
Authors C. Ihlebaek
Tommy H. Hansson
E. Laerum
S. Brage
H. R. Eriksen
Sten Holm
R. Svendsrod
A. Indahl
Published in Scand J Public Health
Volume 34
Issue 5
Pages 555-8
ISSN 1403-4948 (Print)
Publication year 2006
Published at Institute of Clinical Sciences
Pages 555-8
Language en
Links www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.f...
Keywords Adult, Female, Humans, Interviews, Low Back Pain/economics/*epidemiology, Male, Middle Aged, Norway/epidemiology, Prevalence, Questionnaires, Risk Factors, *Sick Leave/economics/statistics & numerical data, Socioeconomic Factors, Sweden/epidemiology
Subject categories Orthopaedics

Abstract

AIMS: Low back pain (LBP) is a major public health problem in both Norway and Sweden. The aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence of LBP and sickness absence due to LBP in two neighbouring regions in Norway and Sweden. The two areas have similar socioeconomic status, but differ in health benefit systems. METHODS: A representative sample of 1,988 adults in Norway and 2,006 in Sweden completed questionnaires concerning LBP during 1999 and 2000. For this study only individuals in part or full time jobs, (n = 1,158 in Norway and n = 1,129 in Sweden) were included. RESULTS: In Norway the lifetime prevalence was 60.7% and in Sweden 69.6%, the one-year prevalence was 40.5% and 47.2%, and the point prevalence 13.4% and 18.2% respectively. There was a significantly higher risk of reporting LBP in Sweden, even after controlling for gender, age, education, and physical workload. There was no difference in risk of self-certified short-term sickness absence (1-3 days), but it was a 40% lower risk of sickness absence with medical sickness certification in Sweden compared with Norway. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of LBP was higher in the Swedish area than in the Norwegian. The risk of self-certified sickness absence, however, showed no differences and the risk of medically certified sickness absence was lower in the Swedish area. This contradiction might partly be explained by the economical "disincentives" in the Swedish health compensation system.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?