To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Systematic review of body… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Systematic review of body image measures

Review article
Authors Johanna Kling
Linda Kwakkenbos
Phillippa Diedrichs
Nichola Rumsey
Ann Frisén
Maria Piedade Brandão
Anabela Silva
Barbara Dooley
Rachel F. Rodgers
Amanda Fitzgerald
Published in Body image
Volume 30
Pages 170-211
ISSN 1740-1445
Publication year 2019
Published at Department of Psychology
Pages 170-211
Language en
Links https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.20...
Keywords Body image, Systematic review, Measurement properties, Self-report questionnaire, Clinical practice, Psychometric
Subject categories Psychology

Abstract

This systematic review synthesizes and critically appraises measurement properties of influential body image measures. Eight measures that met the definition of an assessment of body image (i.e., an individual’s cognitive or affective evaluation of their body or appearance with a positive or negative valence), and scored high on systematic expert priority ranking, were included. These measures were: the Body Appreciation Scale (original BAS and BAS-2), the Body Esteem Scale for Adolescents and Adults, the Body Shape Questionnaire, the Centre for Appearance Research Valence Scale, the Drive for Muscularity Scale, two subscales of the Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire, one subscale of the Eating Disorder Inventory 3, and two subscales of the Multidimensional Body Relations Questionnaire. Articles assessing these scales’ psychometric properties (N = 136) were evaluated for their methodological quality using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist, and a best evidence synthesis was performed. The results supported the majority of measures in terms of reliability and validity; however, suitability varied across populations, and some measurement properties were insufficiently evaluated. The measures are discussed in detail, including recommendations for their future use in research and clinical practice.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?