To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Speaking truth to power: … - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
To content Read more about how we use cookies on

Speaking truth to power: Political advisers' and civil servants' responses to perceived harmful policy proposals

Journal article
Authors Birgitta Niklasson
Peter Munk Christiansen
Patrik Öhberg
Published in Journal of Public Policy
ISSN 0143814X
Publication year 2019
Published at Department of Political Science
Language en
Keywords bureaucratic responses, civil servants, ministerial advice, political advisers, politicisation
Subject categories Public Administration Studies


© Cambridge University Press 2019. How are civil servants and politically appointed advisers likely to respond to policy proposals that they believe will harm their countries severely even if they are legal? Based on the different loyalties and roles of political advisors (PA) and civil servants (CS), we hypothesise that (1) PAs are more likely to voice internally, (2) CSs are more likely to voice externally and (3) CSs in functionally politicised systems are more likely to stay silent. These hypotheses are tested on - and partially supported by - data collected through two surveys directed to the ministerial staffs in Denmark and Sweden. PAs are more likely to voice internally, but none of the two groups is particularly keen to voice externally. The propensity to voice concerns in case of perceived harmful policy proposals depends on the kind as well as the level of politicisation.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?