To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Att betygsätta elevers ku… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
To content Read more about how we use cookies on

Att betygsätta elevers kunskaper – möjligheter och begränsningar

Journal article
Authors Frank Bach
Birgitta Frändberg
Mats Hagman
Ann Zetterqvist
Eva West
Published in NorDiNa : Nordic Studies in Science Education
Volume 15
Issue 2
Pages 150-173
ISSN 1504-4556
Publication year 2019
Published at Department of Pedagogical, Curricular and Professional Studies
Pages 150-173
Language sv
Keywords national curriculum, science school subject, national tests, grading, factor analysis, Rasch modelling
Subject categories


National tests in the natural sciences for grade 6 were carried out 2013 - 2015. One aim was to provide information about students’ scientific knowledge according to the “abilities”: communicating, exploring and explaining, as stated in the syllabus. Are these “abilities” possible and reasonable to distinguish from each other? Answers (60,000) were used for exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and controlled for dimensionality in a Rasch model. The results show that the tests mainly capture one overall ability. It was not possible to separate the three “abilities” in a reliable way. Thus, our analyses show that dividing the test into subscales for grading the “abilities” jeopardize test validity. A more reliable option might be to let students’ strong and weak performances in relation to different parts of the syllabus compensate for each other. Lastly we discuss our results in relation to the Swedish educational legislation.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?