To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Managers’ views on how in… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
To content Read more about how we use cookies on

Managers’ views on how intellectual capital is recognized and managed in practice: A multiple case study of four Swedish firms

Journal article
Authors Daniel Tyskbo
Published in Journal of Intellectual Capital
Volume 20
Issue 2
Pages 282-304
ISSN 1469-1930
Publication year 2019
Published at Department of Business Administration, Management & Organisation
Centre for Global Human Resource Management
Pages 282-304
Language en
Keywords Intellectual capital, Practice-based approach, Case studies, Measurement, Resource allocation, Sweden
Subject categories Business Administration


Purpose The purpose of this paper is to advance the understanding of how intellectual capital (IC) unfolds in practice in organizations. This is done by answering the research question of how IC is recognized and managed in practice as expressed by managers. Design/methodology/approach An explorative, empirical and multiple case study was conducted, investigating four Swedish firms. Findings This paper illustrates how IC was recognized and managed in practice despite managers expressing uncertainty of what the IC concept means. More or less direct, formalized and purposeful ways were adopted. The IC elements and practices most important from a management perspective were those aligned with the overall strategy, but were seldom what was visible in financial reports. Research limitations/implications The use of an explorative, multiple case study limits the generalizability. However, the rich view gained of how IC unfolds in practice may not always be possible using large sample, survey-studies. Future research is therefore suggested to take this paper's insights further and investigate IC in other organizations and in other national contexts. Originality/value This paper responds to the calls for third stage IC research, by showing how IC management in practice may not be as clear and straightforward as researchers tend to assume. It also adds to the importance debate on IC accountingization, by reflecting on how an accounting dominance may not fully capture IC inside organizations. A number of practical contributions are also made.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?