To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Embracing heterogeneity: … - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Embracing heterogeneity: coalescing the Tree of Life and the future of phylogenomics

Journal article
Authors G. A. Bravo
Alexandre Antonelli
Christine D. Bacon
K. Bartoszek
M. P. K. Blom
S. Huynh
G. Jones
L. L. Knowles
Sangeet Lamichhaney
T. Marcussen
H. Morlon
L. K. Nakhleh
B. Oxelman
B. Pfeil
A. Schliep
N. Wahlberg
F. P. Werneck
J. Wiedenhoeft
S. Willows-Munro
S. V. Edwards
Published in Peerj
Volume 7
ISSN 2167-8359
Publication year 2019
Published at Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences
Language en
Links dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6399
Keywords Gene flow, Genome, Multispecies coalescent model, Retroelement, Speciation, Transcriptome, gene trees, species trees, multispecies coalescent, evolutionary, history, divergence-time, molecular systematics, population-genetics, bayesian-inference, phylogenetic-relationships, penalized likelihood, Science & Technology - Other Topics
Subject categories Biological Sciences

Abstract

Building the Tree of Life (ToL) is a major challenge of modern biology, requiring advances in cyberinfrastructure, data collection, theory, and more. Here, we argue that phylogenomics stands to benefit by embracing the many heterogeneous genomic signals emerging from the first decade of large-scale phylogenetic analysis spawned by high-throughput sequencing (HTS). Such signals include those most commonly encountered in phylogenomic datasets, such as incomplete lineage sorting, but also those reticulate processes emerging with greater frequency, such as recombination and introgression. Here we focus specifically on how phylogenetic methods can accommodate the heterogeneity incurred by such population genetic processes; we do not discuss phylogenetic methods that ignore such processes, such as concatenation or supermatrix approaches or supertrees. We suggest that methods of data acquisition and the types of markers used in phylogenomics will remain restricted until a posteriori methods of marker choice are made possible with routine whole-genome sequencing of taxa of interest. We discuss limitations and potential extensions of a model supporting innovation in phylogenomics today, the multispecies coalescent model (MSC). Macroevolutionary models that use phylogenies, such as character mapping, often ignore the heterogeneity on which building phylogenies increasingly rely and suggest that assimilating such heterogeneity is an important goal moving forward. Finally, we argue that an integrative cyberinfrastructure linking all steps of the process of building the ToL, from specimen acquisition in the field to publication and tracking of phylogenomic data, as well as a culture that values contributors at each step, are essential for progress.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?