To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Revisiting the etymology … - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Revisiting the etymology of the Nordic negative enclitic -a/-at

Working paper
Authors Eric Lander
Place of publication Stockholm & Lund
Publication year 2018
Published at Department of Swedish
Language en
Links https://projekt.ht.lu.se/fileadmin/...
Keywords negation, etymology, Jespersen's Cycle, grammaticalization
Subject categories Languages and Literature

Abstract

In this paper I present and discuss the etymological hypotheses that have been put forth through the years for Norse -a/-at ‘not’, a negative particle suffixed to finite and imperative verbs, found primarily in Old Icelandic and Old Norwegian. The four main etymologies that I will evaluate are: (i) the connector/generalizing particle PGmc *-(u)hw (cf. Go. -uh), (ii) the numeral for ‘one’: PGmc *aina/*ainat- (cf. Go. ain, ainata), (iii) a reinforcer associated with various pronouns: PGmc *-ã (cf. runic eka, ika, etc.) or perhaps PGmc *-ō̃ (cf. Go. þat-a, þana, in-a, OE þon-e, hin-e, etc.), and (iv) the (negative) indefinite phrases ‘(n)ever’ and ‘(n)ever a thing’: PGmc *(n-)aiwa-/*(n-)aiwa-weht-. As we shall see below, each etymology has its share of support from scholars. However, some ideas have aged better than others. Nevertheless, it is useful to discuss all of the proposals in the literature since there are conceptual overlaps and interrelated assumptions weaving their way through the hypotheses in (i-iv). The goal of this paper is to critically assess each of these etymologies, thereby giving an overview of their respective advantages and disadvantages.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?