To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Struggling for a feasible… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Struggling for a feasible tool - the process of implementing a clinical pathway in intensive care: a grounded theory study

Journal article
Authors P. Bjurling-Sjoberg
B. Wadensten
U. Poder
Inger Jansson
L. Nordgren
Published in BMC Health Serv Res
Volume 18
ISSN 1472-6963
Publication year 2018
Published at Institute of Health and Care Sciences
Language en
Links dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3629-...
Keywords Action research, Critical care, Critical pathways, Grounded theory, Health service research, Implementation, Intensive care, Interprofessional collaboration, Standardized care plan, unit, conclusions, challenges, teamwork, working, Health Care Sciences & Services
Subject categories Health Sciences

Abstract

BackgroundClinical pathways can enhance care quality, promote patient safety and optimize resource utilization. However, they are infrequently utilized in intensive care. This study aimed to explain the implementation process of a clinical pathway based on a bottom-up approach in an intensive care context.MethodsThe setting was an 11-bed general intensive care unit in Sweden. An action research project was conducted to implement a clinical pathway for patients on mechanical ventilation. The project was managed by a local interprofessional core group and was externally facilitated by two researchers. Grounded theory was used by the researchers to explain the implementation process. The sampling in the study was purposeful and theoretical and included registered nurses (n31), assistant nurses (n26), anesthesiologists (n11), a physiotherapist (n1), first- and second-line managers (n2), and health records from patients on mechanical ventilation (n136). Data were collected from 2011 to 2016 through questionnaires, repeated focus groups, individual interviews, logbooks/field notes and health records. Constant comparative analysis was conducted, including both qualitative data and descriptive statistics from the quantitative data.ResultsA conceptual model of the clinical pathway implementation process emerged, and a central phenomenon, which was conceptualized as Struggling for a feasible tool,' was the core category that linked all categories. The phenomenon evolved from the Triggers' (Perceiving suboptimal practice' and Receiving external inspiration and support'), pervaded the Implementation process' (Contextual circumstances,' Processual circumstances' and Negotiating to achieve progress'), and led to the process Output' (Varying utilization' and Improvements in understanding and practice'). The categories included both facilitating and impeding factors that made the implementation process tentative and prolonged but also educational.ConclusionsThe findings provide a novel understanding of a bottom-up implementation of a clinical pathway in an intensive care context. Despite resonating well with existing implementation frameworks/theories, the conceptual model further illuminates the complex interaction between different circumstances and negotiations and how this interplay has consequences for the implementation process and output. The findings advocate a bottom-up approach but also emphasize the need for strategic priority, interprofessional participation, skilled facilitators and further collaboration.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?