To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Three-Dimensional Volumet… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Three-Dimensional Volumetric Segmentation of Pituitary Tumors: Assessment of Inter-rater Agreement and Comparison with Conventional Geometric Equations

Journal article
Authors K. Lindberg
A. Kouti
D. Ziegelitz
T. Hallen
Thomas Skoglund
Dan Farahmand
Published in Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B-Skull Base
Volume 79
Issue 5
Pages 475-481
ISSN 2193-6331
Publication year 2018
Published at Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology
Pages 475-481
Language en
Links dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1618577
Keywords pituitary tumor volume, volumetric analysis, segmentation, abc/2, nervous-system tumors, abc/2 estimation technique, transsphenoidal, surgery, image segmentation, adenomas, reliability, brain, mr, hemorrhage, hematomas, Neurosciences & Neurology, Surgery
Subject categories Neurosciences

Abstract

Background The assessment of pituitary tumor (PT) volume is important in the treatment and follow-up of patients with PT. Previously, PT volume estimation has been performed by conventional geometric equations (CGE) such as abc/2 (simplified ellipsoid volume equation) and 4 pi r(3)/3 (sphere), both presuming a symmetric tumor shape, which occurs uncommonly in patients with PT. In contrast, three-dimensional (3D) voxel-based software segmentation takes the irregular and asymmetric shapes that PTs often possess into account and might be a more accurate method for PT volume segmentation. The purpose of this study is twofold. (1) To compare 3D segmentation with CGE for PT volume estimation. (2) To assess inter-rater reliability in 3D segmentation of PTs. Methods Nineteen high-resolution (1mm slice thickness) T1-weighted MRI examinations of patients with PT were independently analyzed and manually segmented, using the software ITK-SNAP, by two certified neuroradiologists. Concurrently, the volumes of the PTs were estimated with abc/2 and 4 pi r(3)/3 by a clinician, and the results were compared with the corresponding segmented volumes. Results There was a significant decrease in PT volume attained from the segmentations compared with the calculations made with abc/2 (p < 0.001, mean volume 18% higher than segmentation) and 4 pi r(3)/3 (p < 0.001, mean volume 28% higher than segmentation). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the two sets of segmented PTs was 0.99. Conclusion CGE (abc/2 and 4 pi r(3)/3) significantly overestimates PT volume compared with 3D volumetric segmentation. The inter-rater agreement on manual 3D volumetric software segmentation is excellent.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?