To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Trade between mass- and r… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
To content Read more about how we use cookies on

Trade between mass- and rate-based regulatory regimes: Bad for emissions?

Journal article
Authors Carolyn Fischer
B. Mao
D. Shawhan
Published in Energy Economics
Volume 73
Pages 326-336
ISSN 0140-9883
Publication year 2018
Published at Department of Economics, Environmental Economics Unit
Pages 326-336
Language en
Keywords Cap and trade, Carbon price, Performance standard, Linking, Leakage, Electric power, Business & Economics
Subject categories Economics


If one jurisdiction regulates power plant emissions with a cap-and-trade (mass) program and another with an intensity (rate) standard, is it a good idea for them to link? Specifically, what effects does introducing electricity and rate-mass allowance trade between differently-regulated regions have on emissions and ultimately welfare? We explore these questions first with a simple theoretical model and then with a sophisticated numerical model of the electricity sector. The theoretical model isolates the policy effects by assuming that two otherwise identical regions are regulated differently. With fixed demand, their autarky marginal abatement costs are identical, but electricity prices are lower in the rate-limited region. Adding electricity trade shifts generation to the rate limited region, expanding its allowance allocation, while emissions remain capped in the mass-capped region. Adding rate-mass allowance trade exacerbates this shift in generation and expansion of emissions. The increase of emission damage could make the net welfare effects negative. However, if the mass cap is sufficiently more stringent than the rate limit, allowing rate-mass allowance trade in the presence of electricity trade can lower emissions. The numerical model of the eastern US illustrates the effects predicted in the theoretical model, and projects their magnitudes. In our simulation that is loosely based on the US Clean Power Plan, the estimated CO2 damage makes the estimated net benefits of allowing rate-mass trading negative. Our results also illustrate that linking can shift the geographic distribution of SO2 and NOx emissions, which can counteract the effect of the CO2 damage on estimated total welfare. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?