To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Feminist Global Political… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
To content Read more about how we use cookies on

Feminist Global Political Economy and Feminist Security Studies? The Politics of Delineating Subfields.

Journal article
Authors Maria Stern
Published in Politics & Gender
Volume 13
Issue 4
Pages 727–733
ISSN 1743-923X
Publication year 2017
Published at School of Global Studies, Peace and Development Research
Gothenburg Centre for Globalization and Development (GCGD)
School of Global Studies
Pages 727–733
Language en
Keywords Feminist Security Studies; Feminist International Political Economy
Subject categories Other Social Sciences, Political Science


When considering possible conversations, synergies, overlaps, similarities, conflicts, and distinctions between two subfields or “camps” (Sylvester 2010), the question of limits looms large. Where, why, and how are the limits of feminist security studies (FSS) and feminist global political economy (FGPE) currently being drawn, and to what effect? Building upon previous conversations about the relationship between FSS and FGPE, particularly as they were discussed in the Critical Perspectives section in Politics & Gender (June 2015), as well as those about FSS and FGPE more generally, I briefly touch on a few central points regarding the politics of boundary drawing and the practices of feminist research.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?