To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Training skills and asses… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
To content Read more about how we use cookies on

Training skills and assessing performance in simulator-based learning environments

Conference paper
Authors Charlott Sellberg
Olle Lindmark
Hans Rystedt
Published in Proceedings from the 18th Annual Assembly of the International Association of Maritime Universities, Varna, Bulgaria, 11-14 October 2017, Volume 1
ISBN 978-954-8991-95-7
Publication year 2017
Published at The Linnaeus Centre for Research on Learning, Interaction, and Mediated Communication in Contemporary Society (LinCS)
Department of Education, Communication and Learning
Language en
Keywords Maritime training; Simulator-based training; Instruction; Assessment; Debriefing
Subject categories Educational Sciences, Other Engineering and Technologies


This article reports the results from a research project on the use of simulator technologies in the training and assessment of professional performance in maritime training. The research draws on ethnographic fieldwork and analyses of video-recorded data to examine how maritime instructors make use of simulator technologies during instruction. Our results reveal an instructional practice where the need to account for general principles of good seamanship and international regulations is at the core of the basic maritime training. The meanings of good seamanship and the rules of the sea are hard to teach in abstraction, since their application relies on an infinite number of contingencies that have to be accounted for in every specific case. Based on this premise, we are stressing the importance of both in-scenario instruction and post-simulation debriefing in order for the instructor to bridge theory and practice in ways that develop the students’ professional competences. Moreover, our results highlight how simulator technologies enable unique ways of displaying and assessing such competences by enabling instructors to continuously monitor, assess and provide feedback to the students throughout training sessions. Our results imply that training models advocating isolating and targeting technical and non-technical skills during training conflict with training for rule-governed maritime operations where such skills are intricately entwined. Furthermore, our results show that debriefing models that recommend a linear chronological order of discrete phases could be misleading. Although this structure might provide an overall resource, processes of connecting principles and rules to a multitude of specific circumstances in the training scenarios are at play throughout the debriefings.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?