Till startsida
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 8. Assessing naso-labial appearance in 5-year-olds - a preliminary study

Journal article
Authors K. Mølsted
K. Humerinta
A. Küseler
P. Skaare
H. Bellardie
W. Shaw
A. Karsten
P. Kåre Sæle
Sara Rizell
A. Marcusson
P. Eyres
G. Semb
Published in Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery
Volume 51
Issue 1
Pages 64-72
ISSN 2000-656X
Publication year 2017
Published at Institute of Odontology
Pages 64-72
Language en
Links doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2016.12664...
Subject categories Plastic surgery, Logopedics and phoniatrics


Background and aim: Facial appearance is one of the most relevant measures of success in cleft lip and palate treatment. The aim was to assess nasolabial appearance at 5 years of age in all children in the project. In this part of the project the local protocol for lip closure continued to be used because the primary lip and nose operations were not part of the randomisation. The great majority of the surgeons used Millard's technique together with McComb's technique for the nose. One center used Tennison-Randalls technique and in one center the centers own technique as well as nose plugs were used. Methods: Three hundred and fifty-nine children participated in this part of the project. Standardised photos according to a specific protocol developed for the Scandcleft project were taken. Only the nasolabial area was shown, the surrounding facial features were masked. Three components were scored using a 5-point ordinal scale. A new developed Scandcleft Yardstick was used. Results: The reliability of the method was tested using the weighted kappa statistics. Both the interrater and intrarater reliability scores were good to very good. There were statistically significant differences between the three trials. Conclusion: The Millard procedure combined with McComb technique had been used in the majority of the cases in all three trials. There were statistically significant differences between the three trials concerning upper lip, nasal form, and cleft side profile.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?