To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Comparison of four DNA ex… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
To content Read more about how we use cookies on

Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for comprehensive assessment of 16S rRNA bacterial diversity in marine biofilms using high-throughput sequencing

Journal article
Authors Natàlia Corcoll
Tobias Österlund
Lucas Sinclair
Alexander Eiler
Erik Kristiansson
Thomas Backhaus
Karl Martin Eriksson
Published in FEMS Microbiology Letters
Volume 364
Issue 14
ISSN 0378-1097
Publication year 2017
Published at Department of Mathematical Sciences
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences
Language en
Subject categories Microbiology, Genetics, Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Ecology, Environmental Sciences


High-throughput DNA sequencing technologies are increasingly used for the metagenomic characterisation of microbial biodiversity. However, basic issues, such as the choice of an appropriate DNA extraction method, are still not resolved for non-model microbial communities. This study evaluates four commonly used DNA extraction methods for marine periphyton biofilms in terms of DNA yield, efficiency, purity, integrity and resulting 16S rRNA bacterial diversity. Among the tested methods, the Plant DNAzol® Reagent (PlantDNAzol) and the FastDNA® SPIN Kit for Soil (FastDNA Soil) methods were best suited to extract high quantities of DNA (77–130 μg g wet wt−1). Lower amounts of DNA were obtained (<37 μg g wet wt−1) with the Power Plant® Pro DNA Isolation Kit (PowerPlant) and the Power Biofilm® DNA Isolation Kit (PowerBiofilm) methods, but integrity and purity of the extracted DNA were higher. Results from 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing demonstrate that the choice of a DNA extraction method significantly influences the bacterial community profiles generated. A higher number of bacterial OTUs were detected when DNA was extracted with the PowerBiofilm and the PlantDNAzol methods. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential bias in metagenomic diversity estimates associated with different DNA extraction methods.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?