Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM
| Authors |
Timothy J. Luke Maria Hartwig Emily Joseph Laure Brimbal Ginny Chan Evan Dawson Sarah Jordan Patricia Donovan Pär-Anders Granhag |
|---|---|
| Published in | Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 270-278 |
| ISSN | 0882-0783 |
| Publication year | 2016 |
| Published at |
Department of Psychology |
| Pages | 270-278 |
| Language | en |
| Links |
doi.org/10.1007/s11896-015-9187-0 |
| Keywords | deception, interrogation, interviewing, Strategic Use of Evidence |
| Subject categories | Psychology |
© 2016, Society for Police and Criminal Psychology.The Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) approach is a framework for planning and executing suspect interviews with the aim of facilitating judgments of truth and deception. US law enforcement officers (N = 59) either received training in the SUE approach or did not. Each officer interviewed a mock suspect (N = 59) who had either committed a simulated security breach or had completed a benign task. The officers who received SUE training interviewed in line with the training: They questioned the suspect systematically, withheld the evidence and critical case information until after questioning, and relied on statement-evidence inconsistency to detect deceit. Consequently, SUE-trained interviewers achieved a higher deception detection accuracy rate (65%) compared to untrained interviewers (43%).
© UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG • Sweden • Box 100 • SE-405 30 Gothenburg
Phone: +46 31 786 0000 • Contact • Organisation number: 202100-3153
About the website
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube
Weibo