To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Hur ny var nyplatonismen?… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Hur ny var nyplatonismen? Några perspektiv på kontinuiteten mellan Platon och Plotinos

Journal article
Authors Anton Svanqvist
Published in Lychnos
Volume 2015
Pages 27–53
ISSN 0076-1648
Publication year 2015
Published at Department of Literature, History of Ideas, and Religion
Pages 27–53
Language sv
Keywords Plato, Plotinus, Neoplatonism, Tübingen school, Plato’s unwritten doctrine, Plato’s protology, The old academy
Subject categories History of Ideas

Abstract

Is the Neoplatonism of Plotinus consistent with Plato’s original philosophy? Since the 18th century, the stock answer among philosophers, historians, and philologists seems to have been a resounding ”No”. In recent times, however, many specialists in the field of Platonic studies have called this view into question, often dropping inconclusive hints to the effect that (1) ”Neoplatonism” is a modern term riddled with problems; that (2) Neoplatonic doctrines can be traced back to the Old Academy and even to Plato himself; and that (3) the philosophy of the Neoplatonists may and even must be understood as a legitimate continuation to that of Plato. In this paper I have outlined some ways to substantiate these claims, by showing that (1) the term ”Neoplatonism” was coined and cemented in modern times by Protestant scholars wishing to dissociate Plato from his late-antique followers, who were regarded as anti-Christian; that (2) Plotinus’ key doctrine of principles can in fact be discerned in Plato’s oral teachings as transmitted by Aristotle and other disciples, as well as by ancient commentators and doxographers; and that (3) this same doctrine of principles may be gleaned from Plato’s written philosophy as well, since it is hinted at and presupposed throughout the dialogues, albeit in a way consistent with Plato’s explicit refusal to commit his loftiest doctrines to writing. I conclude the study with some remarks on the hermeneutical stance of Plotinus and his followers, and emphasize the importance for modern observers to come to terms with it when assessing the continuity between Plato and the Neoplatonists.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?